mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Comparative Evaluation of Additive Separability Tests for Physics-Informed Machine Learning

arXiv 2312.09775 ↗First posted 15 Dec 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many functions characterising physical systems are additively separable. This is the case, for instance, of mechanical Hamiltonian functions in physics, population growth equations in biology, and consumer preference and utility functions in economics. We consider the scenario in which a surrogate of a function is to be tested for additive separability. The detection that the surrogate is additively separable can be leveraged to improve further learning. Hence, it is beneficial to have the ability to test for such separability in surrogates. The mathematical approach is to test if the mixed partial derivative of the surrogate is zero; or empirically, lower than a threshold. We present and comparatively and empirically evaluate the eight methods to compute the mixed partial derivative of a surrogate function.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2023.

Builds on

7 of 25 references.

References · 7

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
  3. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  4. 2022Deconstructing the Inductive Biases of Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 31
  5. 2021Compositional Modeling of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems with ODE-based Random Featurescited by 8
  6. 2022ModLaNets: Learning Generalisable Dynamics via Modularity and Physical Inductive Biascited by 4
  7. 2023What's Next? Predicting Hamiltonian Dynamics from Discrete Observations of a Vector Fieldcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.