Hybrid Sample Synthesis-based Debiasing of Classifier in Limited Data Setting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning models are known to suffer from the problem of bias, and researchers have been exploring methods to address this issue. However, most of these methods require prior knowledge of the bias and are not always practical. In this paper, we focus on a more practical setting with no prior information about the bias. Generally, in this setting, there are a large number of bias-aligned samples that cause the model to produce biased predictions and a few bias-conflicting samples that do not conform to the bias. If the training data is limited, the influence of the bias-aligned samples may become even stronger on the model predictions, and we experimentally demonstrate that existing debiasing techniques suffer severely in such cases. In this paper, we examine the effects of unknown bias in small dataset regimes and present a novel approach to mitigate this issue. The proposed approach directly addresses the issue of the extremely low occurrence of bias-conflicting samples in limited data settings through the synthesis of hybrid samples that can be used to reduce the effect of bias. We perform extensive experiments on several benchmark datasets and experimentally demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach in addressing any unknown bias in the presence of limited data. Specifically, our approach outperforms the vanilla, LfF, LDD, and DebiAN debiasing methods by absolute margins of 10.39%, 9.08%, 8.07%, and 9.67% when only 10% of the Corrupted CIFAR-10 Type 1 dataset is available with a bias-conflicting sample ratio of 0.05.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2023.
Builds on
21 of 25 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2020Self-Challenging Improves Cross-Domain Generalizationcited by 426
- 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 279
- 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
- 2019Learning De-biased Representations with Biased Representationscited by 199
- 2020Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifiercited by 133
9 more
- 2019Learning Robust Representations by Projecting Superficial Statistics Outcited by 123
- 2021Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentationcited by 116
- 2021Evidential Deep Learning for Open Set Action Recognitioncited by 96
- 2021BiaSwap: Removing dataset bias with bias-tailored swapping augmentationcited by 70
- 2022Discover and Mitigate Unknown Biases with Debiasing Alternate Networkscited by 47
- 2016Object Recognition with and without Objectscited by 39
- 2020Latent Adversarial Debiasing: Mitigating Collider Bias in Deep Neural Networkscited by 16
- 2022Learning to Split for Automatic Bias Detectioncited by 16
- 2021Learning Stable Classifiers by Transferring Unstable Featurescited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
- 2024Looking at Model Debiasing through the Lens of Anomaly Detectioncited by 2
- 2025BLADE: Bias-Linked Adaptive DEbiasingcited by 0
- 2025BLADE: Bias-Linked Adaptive DEbiasing5 Oct 2025
- 2024Looking at Model Debiasing through the Lens of Anomaly Detection24 Jul 2024