The State of Pilot Study Reporting in Crowdsourcing: A Reflection on Best Practices and Guidelines
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pilot studies are an essential cornerstone of the design of crowdsourcing campaigns, yet they are often only mentioned in passing in the scholarly literature. A lack of details surrounding pilot studies in crowdsourcing research hinders the replication of studies and the reproduction of findings, stalling potential scientific advances. We conducted a systematic literature review on the current state of pilot study reporting at the intersection of crowdsourcing and HCI research. Our review of ten years of literature included 171 articles published in the proceedings of the Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (AAAI HCOMP) and the ACM Digital Library. We found that pilot studies in crowdsourcing research (i.e., crowd pilot studies) are often under-reported in the literature. Important details, such as the number of workers and rewards to workers, are often not reported. On the basis of our findings, we reflect on the current state of practice and formulate a set of best practice guidelines for reporting crowd pilot studies in crowdsourcing research. We also provide implications for the design of crowdsourcing platforms and make practical suggestions for supporting crowd pilot study reporting.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025UXAgent: A System for Simulating Usability Testing of Web Design with LLM Agentscited by 10
- 2025The Hall of AI Fears and Hopes: Comparing the Views of AI Influencers and those of Members of the U.S. Public Through an Interactive Platformcited by 2
- 2026Incentive-Tuning: Understanding and Designing Incentives for Empirical Human-AI Decision-Making Studiescited by 2
- 2026The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotationcited by 1
- 2026What Do We Mean by 'Pilot Study': Early Findings from a Meta-Review of Pilot Study Reporting at CHIcited by 0
- 2026What Do We Mean by 'Pilot Study': Early Findings from a Meta-Review of Pilot Study Reporting at CHI13 Feb 2026
- 2026The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotation11 Feb 2026
- 2026Incentive-Tuning: Understanding and Designing Incentives for Empirical Human-AI Decision-Making Studies21 Jan 2026
- 2025UXAgent: A System for Simulating Usability Testing of Web Design with LLM Agents13 Apr 2025
- 2025The Hall of AI Fears and Hopes: Comparing the Views of AI Influencers and those of Members of the U.S. Public Through an Interactive Platform8 Apr 2025