mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Post-hoc α Hypothesis Testing and the Post-hoc p-value

arXiv 2312.08040 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2023math.ST stat.ME stat.THcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In traditional hypothesis testing one must pre-specify the significance level α to bound the `size' of the test: its probability to falsely reject the hypothesis. Indeed, a data-dependent selection of α would generally distort the size, possibly making it larger than the specified level α. We explore hypothesis testing with a data-dependent choice of α by guaranteeing that there is no such size distortion in expectation, even if the level α is arbitrarily selected based on the data. Unlike regular p-values, resulting `post-hoc p-values' allow us to `reject at level p' and still provide this guarantee. Interestingly, we find that p is a post-hoc p-value if and only if 1/p is an e-value, a recently introduced measure of evidence. While often treated as different paradigms, this reveals e-values are simply p-values under a stronger error guarantee, thinly veiled by the reciprocal p = 1/e. Moreover, we extend classical optimal testing to optimal post-hoc testing. Finally, we apply our work to close Markov's inequality into a post-hoc α equality, and we study more general forms of post-hoc testing that require us to generalize beyond e-values.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.