mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards A Flexible Accuracy-Oriented Deep Learning Module Inference Latency Prediction Framework for Adaptive Optimization Algorithms

arXiv 2312.06440 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.PFcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid development of Deep Learning, more and more applications on the cloud and edge tend to utilize large DNN (Deep Neural Network) models for improved task execution efficiency as well as decision-making quality. Due to memory constraints, models are commonly optimized using compression, pruning, and partitioning algorithms to become deployable onto resource-constrained devices. As the conditions in the computational platform change dynamically, the deployed optimization algorithms should accordingly adapt their solutions. To perform frequent evaluations of these solutions in a timely fashion, RMs (Regression Models) are commonly trained to predict the relevant solution quality metrics, such as the resulted DNN module inference latency, which is the focus of this paper. Existing prediction frameworks specify different RM training workflows, but none of them allow flexible configurations of the input parameters (e.g., batch size, device utilization rate) and of the selected RMs for different modules. In this paper, a deep learning module inference latency prediction framework is proposed, which i) hosts a set of customizable input parameters to train multiple different RMs per DNN module (e.g., convolutional layer) with self-generated datasets, and ii) automatically selects a set of trained RMs leading to the highest possible overall prediction accuracy, while keeping the prediction time / space consumption as low as possible. Furthermore, a new RM, namely MEDN (Multi-task Encoder-Decoder Network), is proposed as an alternative solution. Comprehensive experiment results show that MEDN is fast and lightweight, and capable of achieving the highest overall prediction accuracy and R-squared value. The Time/Space-efficient Auto-selection algorithm also manages to improve the overall accuracy by 2.5% and R-squared by 0.39%, compared to the MEDN single-selection scheme.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2023.

Builds on

10 of 20 references.

References · 10

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  4. 2019Edge AI: On-Demand Accelerating Deep Neural Network Inference via Edge Computingcited by 152
  5. 2017Distributed Deep Neural Networks over the Cloud, the Edge and End Devicescited by 120
  6. 2020CoEdge: Cooperative DNN Inference with Adaptive Workload Partitioning over Heterogeneous Edge Devicescited by 67
  7. 2021Auto-Split: A General Framework of Collaborative Edge-Cloud AIcited by 30
  8. 2020Branchy-GNN: a Device-Edge Co-Inference Framework for Efficient Point Cloud Processingcited by 21
  9. 2020Joint Multi-User DNN Partitioning and Computational Resource Allocation for Collaborative Edge Intelligencecited by 12
  10. 2022Multi-user Co-inference with Batch Processing Capable Edge Servercited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.