Exploiting Representation Bias for Data Distillation in Abstractive Text Summarization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Abstractive text summarization is surging with the number of training samples to cater to the needs of the deep learning models. These models tend to exploit the training data representations to attain superior performance by improving the quantitative element of the resultant summary. However, increasing the size of the training set may not always be the ideal solution to maximize the performance, and therefore, a need to revisit the quality of training samples and the learning protocol of deep learning models is a must. In this paper, we aim to discretize the vector space of the abstractive text summarization models to understand the characteristics learned between the input embedding space and the models' encoder space. We show that deep models fail to capture the diversity of the input space. Further, the distribution of data points on the encoder space indicates that an unchecked increase in the training samples does not add value; rather, a tear-down of data samples is highly needed to make the models focus on variability and faithfulness. We employ clustering techniques to learn the diversity of a model's sample space and how data points are mapped from the embedding space to the encoder space and vice versa. Further, we devise a metric to filter out redundant data points to make the model more robust and less data hungry. We benchmark our proposed method using quantitative metrics, such as Rouge, and qualitative metrics, such as BERTScore, FEQA and Pyramid score. We also quantify the reasons that inhibit the models from learning the diversity from the varied input samples.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2023.
Builds on
31 of 48 references.
References · 31
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,413
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
- 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
- 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 812
- 2019Multi-News: a Large-Scale Multi-Document Summarization Dataset and Abstractive Hierarchical Modelcited by 431
19 more
- 2020FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 293
- 2018Bottom-Up Abstractive Summarizationcited by 177
- 2020Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Modelscited by 108
- 2022Understanding Factual Errors in Summarization: Errors, Summarizers, Datasets, Error Detectorscited by 104
- 2021Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selectioncited by 76
- 2020Improving Zero and Few-Shot Abstractive Summarization with Intermediate Fine-tuning and Data Augmentationcited by 53
- 2018Adapting the Neural Encoder-Decoder Framework from Single to Multi-Document Summarizationcited by 42
- 2019Earlier Isn't Always Better: Sub-aspect Analysis on Corpus and System Biases in Summarizationcited by 28
- 2022Coloring the Blank Slate: Pre-training Imparts a Hierarchical Inductive Bias to Sequence-to-sequence Modelscited by 28
- 2022Learning to Revise References for Faithful Summarizationcited by 28
- 2020Minimize Exposure Bias of Seq2Seq Models in Joint Entity and Relation Extractioncited by 27
- 2020What they do when in doubt: a study of inductive biases in seq2seq learnerscited by 20
- 2019A Closer Look at Data Bias in Neural Extractive Summarization Modelscited by 18
- 2021See, Hear, Read: Leveraging Multimodality with Guided Attention for Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 18
- 2018CQASUMM: Building References for Community Question Answering Summarization Corporacited by 11
- 2020Corpora Evaluation and System Bias Detection in Multi-document Summarizationcited by 8
- 2023Fusing Multimodal Signals on Hyper-complex Space for Extreme Abstractive Text Summarization (TL;DR) of Scientific Contentscited by 7
- 2021Subjective Bias in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 5
- 2019In Conclusion Not Repetition: Comprehensive Abstractive Summarization With Diversified Attention Based On Determinantal Point Processescited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.