mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PILLOW: Enhancing Efficient Instruction Fine-tuning via Prompt Matching

arXiv 2312.05621 ↗First posted 9 Dec 2023cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction fine-tuning has conventionally been employed to adapt Large Language Models (LLMs) to a variety of tasks. Nonetheless, this technique often necessitates substantial computational resources, making it impractical for deployment by individuals or small-scale entities. Recently, Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become a promising alternative, offering high capabilities on par with full tuning with reduced resource overhead. However, attaining satisfactory performance through the fine-tuning of LoRA is a non-trivial challenge. In this paper, we propose PILLOW, which aims to improve LoRA's performance by a discrimination-based prompting method, leveraging LLMs' In-Context Learning ability. PILLOW incorporates a matching network that selects prompts from a user-defined prompt pool, concatenates the selected prompts with the user instruction as input, and performs inference using the LoRA-fine-tuned LLMs. Trained with Reinforcement Learning, PILLOW exhibits commensurate performance on various evaluation metrics compared with typical instruction fine-tuning methods, utilizing only consumer-grade GPU resources and exhibiting a large reduction in computational costs.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2023.

Builds on

21 of 35 references.

References · 21

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  3. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  4. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  5. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  6. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  7. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  8. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  9. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
  10. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  11. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,184
  12. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
9 more
  1. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  2. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  3. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 715
  4. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
  5. 2021Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learningcited by 641
  6. 2022RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement Learningcited by 361
  7. 2021Recent Advances in Reinforcement Learning in Financecited by 102
  8. 2023One-for-All: Generalized LoRA for Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuningcited by 84
  9. 2022Bellman Meets Hawkes: Model-Based Reinforcement Learning via Temporal Point Processescited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 1.

6 papers.