mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FLoW3 -- Web3 Empowered Federated Learning

arXiv 2312.05459 ↗First posted 9 Dec 2023cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Federated unlearning and poisoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning is susceptible to various kinds of attacks like Data Poisoning, Model Poisoning and Man in the Middle attack. We perceive Federated Learning as a hierarchical structure, a federation of nodes with validators as the head. The process of validation is done through consensus by employing Novelty Detection and Snowball protocol, to identify valuable and relevant updates while filtering out potentially malicious or irrelevant updates, thus preventing Model Poisoning attacks. The opinion of the validators is recorded in blockchain and trust score is calculated. In case of lack of consensus, trust score is used to determine the impact of validators on the global model. A hyperparameter is introduced to guide the model generation process, either to rely on consensus or on trust score. This approach ensures transparency and reliability in the aggregation process and allows the global model to benefit from insights of most trusted nodes. In the training phase, the combination of IPFS , PGP encryption provides : a) secure and decentralized storage b) mitigates single point of failure making this system reliable and c) resilient against man in the middle attack. The system is realized by implementing in python and Foundry for smart contract development. Global Model is tested against data poisoning by flipping the labels and by introducing malicious nodes. Results found to be similar to that of Flower.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.