mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

High-Quality Live Video Streaming via Transcoding Time Prediction and Preset Selection

arXiv 2312.05348 ↗First posted 8 Dec 2023cs.MM cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Video streaming often requires transcoding content into different resolutions and bitrates to match the recipient's internet speed and screen capabilities. Video encoders like x264 offer various presets, each with different tradeoffs between transcoding time and rate-distortion performance. Choosing the best preset for video transcoding is difficult, especially for live streaming, as trying all the presets and choosing the best one is not feasible. One solution is to predict each preset's transcoding time and select the preset that ensures the highest quality while adhering to live streaming time constraints. Prediction of video transcoding time is also critical in minimizing streaming delays, deploying resource management algorithms, and load balancing. We propose a learning-based framework for predicting the transcoding time of videos across various presets. Our predictor's features for video transcoding time prediction are derived directly from the ingested stream, primarily from the header or metadata. As a result, only minimal additional delay is incurred for feature extraction, rendering our approach ideal for live-streaming applications. We evaluated our learning-based transcoding time prediction using a dataset of videos. The results demonstrate that our framework can accurately predict the transcoding time for different presets, with a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of nearly 5.0%. Leveraging these predictions, we then select the most suitable transcoding preset for live video streaming. Utilizing our transcoding time prediction-based preset selection improved Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) of up to 5 dB.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2023.

Builds on

3 of 29 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017Adaptive Huber Regressioncited by 60
  2. 2016Mean Absolute Percentage Error for regression modelscited by 58
  3. 2021CTU Depth Decision Algorithms for HEVC: A Surveycited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.