Operationalizing Assurance Cases for Data Scientists: A Showcase of Concepts and Tooling in the Context of Test Data Quality for Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Assurance Cases (ACs) are an established approach in safety engineering to argue quality claims in a structured way. In the context of quality assurance for Machine Learning (ML)-based software components, ACs are also being discussed and appear promising. Tools for operationalizing ACs do exist, yet mainly focus on supporting safety engineers on the system level. However, assuring the quality of an ML component within the system is commonly the responsibility of data scientists, who are usually less familiar with these tools. To address this gap, we propose a framework to support the operationalization of ACs for ML components based on technologies that data scientists use on a daily basis: Python and Jupyter Notebook. Our aim is to make the process of creating ML-related evidence in ACs more effective. Results from the application of the framework, documented through notebooks, can be integrated into existing AC tools. We illustrate the application of the framework on an example excerpt concerned with the quality of the test data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2023.
Builds on
6 of 22 references.
References · 6
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
- 2021Guidance on the Assurance of Machine Learning in Autonomous Systems (AMLAS)cited by 42
- 2021Towards a Common Testing Terminology for Software Engineering and Data Science Expertscited by 5
- 2019Model Based System Assurance Using the Structured Assurance Case Metamodelcited by 4
- 2022Integrating Testing and Operation-related Quantitative Evidences in Assurance Cases to Argue Safety of Data-Driven AI/ML Componentscited by 1
- 2023Badgers: generating data quality deficits with Pythoncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.