Taming Subnet-Drift in D2D-Enabled Fog Learning: A Hierarchical Gradient Tracking Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) encounters scalability challenges when implemented over fog networks. Semi-decentralized FL (SD-FL) proposes a solution that divides model cooperation into two stages: at the lower stage, device-to-device (D2D) communications is employed for local model aggregations within subnetworks (subnets), while the upper stage handles device-server (DS) communications for global model aggregations. However, existing SD-FL schemes are based on gradient diversity assumptions that become performance bottlenecks as data distributions become more heterogeneous. In this work, we develop semi-decentralized gradient tracking (SD-GT), the first SD-FL methodology that removes the need for such assumptions by incorporating tracking terms into device updates for each communication layer. Analytical characterization of SD-GT reveals convergence upper bounds for both non-convex and strongly-convex problems, for a suitable choice of step size. We employ the resulting bounds in the development of a co-optimization algorithm for optimizing subnet sampling rates and D2D rounds according to a performance-efficiency trade-off. Our subsequent numerical evaluations demonstrate that SD-GT obtains substantial improvements in trained model quality and communication cost relative to baselines in SD-FL and gradient tracking on several datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Hierarchical Federated Learning with Multi-Timescale Gradient Correctioncited by 7
- 2025Gradient Correction in Federated Learning with Adaptive Optimizationcited by 1
- 2025Decentralized Domain Generalization with Style Sharing: Formal Model and Convergence Analysiscited by 0
- 2025A Unified Convergence Analysis for Semi-Decentralized Learning: Sampled-to-Sampled vs. Sampled-to-All Communicationcited by 0
- 2026Optimizing Server Placement for Vertical Federated Learning in Dynamic Edge/Fog Networkscited by 0
- 2026Optimizing Server Placement for Vertical Federated Learning in Dynamic Edge/Fog Networks10 May 2026
- 2025A Unified Convergence Analysis for Semi-Decentralized Learning: Sampled-to-Sampled vs. Sampled-to-All Communication14 Nov 2025
- 2025Decentralized Domain Generalization with Style Sharing: Formal Model and Convergence Analysis8 Apr 2025
- 2025Gradient Correction in Federated Learning with Adaptive Optimization4 Feb 2025
- 2024Hierarchical Federated Learning with Multi-Timescale Gradient Correction27 Sep 2024