Error Discovery by Clustering Influence Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a method for identifying groups of test examples -- slices -- on which a model under-performs, a task now known as slice discovery. We formalize coherence -- a requirement that erroneous predictions, within a slice, should be wrong for the same reason -- as a key property that any slice discovery method should satisfy. We then use influence functions to derive a new slice discovery method, InfEmbed, which satisfies coherence by returning slices whose examples are influenced similarly by the training data. InfEmbed is simple, and consists of applying K-Means clustering to a novel representation we deem influence embeddings. We show InfEmbed outperforms current state-of-the-art methods on 2 benchmarks, and is effective for model debugging across several case studies.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2023.
Builds on
35 of 51 references.
References · 35
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
- 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
- 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 221
- 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 208
- 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 177
23 more
- 2022Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal Embeddingscited by 155
- 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
- 2021Scaling Up Influence Functionscited by 130
- 2020COVID-19 Image Data Collection: Prospective Predictions Are the Futurecited by 100
- 2021Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?cited by 98
- 2021An Interpretability Illusion for BERTcited by 94
- 2020Evaluating Saliency Map Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks: A User Studycited by 86
- 2021Influence Selection for Active Learningcited by 82
- 2022Distilling Model Failures as Directions in Latent Spacecited by 82
- 2021The Spotlight: A General Method for Discovering Systematic Errors in Deep Learning Modelscited by 63
- 2022Post hoc Explanations may be Ineffective for Detecting Unknown Spurious Correlationcited by 59
- 2020Understanding Failures of Deep Networks via Robust Feature Extractioncited by 56
- 2018Deep Learning Predicts Hip Fracture using Confounding Patient and Healthcare Variablescited by 50
- 2021Interactive Label Cleaning with Example-based Explanationscited by 48
- 2022Discovering Bugs in Vision Models using Off-the-shelf Image Generation and Captioningcited by 45
- 2022The Road to Explainability is Paved with Bias: Measuring the Fairness of Explanationscited by 41
- 2019Can You Trust This Prediction? Auditing Pointwise Reliability After Learningcited by 28
- 2021How Well do Feature Visualizations Support Causal Understanding of CNN Activations?cited by 28
- 2016Identifying Unknown Unknowns in the Open World: Representations and Policies for Guided Explorationcited by 26
- 2021Understanding Instance-based Interpretability of Variational Auto-Encoderscited by 21
- 2022SEAL : Interactive Tool for Systematic Error Analysis and Labelingcited by 15
- 2016Debugging Machine Learning Taskscited by 9
- 2022Understanding out-of-distribution accuracies through quantifying difficulty of test samplescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2024What is Dataset Distillation Learning?cited by 13
- 2025Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector Productscited by 10
- 2024Towards User-Focused Research in Training Data Attribution for Human-Centered Explainable AIcited by 3
- 2026Measurement Under Selection: Decoy-Calibrated Failure Audits for Language Modelscited by 1
- 2025LLM generation novelty through the lens of semantic similaritycited by 0
- 2025GH-ESD: Grounded Hypothesis-Driven Error Slice Discovery for Instance-Level Vision Taskscited by 0
- 2026DeMix: Debugging Training Data with Mixed Data Error Types by Investigating Influence Vectorscited by 0
- 2026DeMix: Debugging Training Data with Mixed Data Error Types by Investigating Influence Vectors10 Jun 2026
- 2026Measurement Under Selection: Decoy-Calibrated Failure Audits for Language Models8 Jun 2026
- 2025GH-ESD: Grounded Hypothesis-Driven Error Slice Discovery for Instance-Level Vision Tasks31 Dec 2025
- 2025LLM generation novelty through the lens of semantic similarity31 Oct 2025
- 2025Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector Products19 Jul 2025
- 2024Towards User-Focused Research in Training Data Attribution for Human-Centered Explainable AI25 Sep 2024
- 2024What is Dataset Distillation Learning?6 Jun 2024