mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LaRS: Latent Reasoning Skills for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

arXiv 2312.04684 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 8

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting is a popular in-context learning (ICL) approach for large language models (LLMs), especially when tackling complex reasoning tasks. Traditional ICL approaches construct prompts using examples that contain questions similar to the input question. However, CoT prompting, which includes crucial intermediate reasoning steps (rationales) within its examples, necessitates selecting examples based on these rationales rather than the questions themselves. Existing methods require human experts or pre-trained LLMs to describe the skill, a high-level abstraction of rationales, to guide the selection. These methods, however, are often costly and difficult to scale. Instead, this paper introduces a new approach named Latent Reasoning Skills (LaRS) that employs unsupervised learning to create a latent space representation of rationales, with a latent variable called a reasoning skill. Concurrently, LaRS learns a reasoning policy to determine the required reasoning skill for a given question. Then the ICL examples are selected by aligning the reasoning skills between past examples and the question. This approach is theoretically grounded and compute-efficient, eliminating the need for auxiliary LLM inference or manual prompt design. Empirical results demonstrate that LaRS consistently outperforms SOTA skill-based selection methods, processing example banks four times faster, reducing LLM inferences during the selection stage by half, and showing greater robustness to sub-optimal example banks.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2023.

Builds on

11 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters20 Dec

Other references · 10

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  3. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
  4. 2021An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inferencecited by 938
  5. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 721
  6. 2022Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 361
  7. 2023Large Language Models Are Latent Variable Models: Explaining and Finding Good Demonstrations for In-Context Learningcited by 149
  8. 2023Skill-Based Few-Shot Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 46
  9. 2023Skills-in-Context Prompting: Unlocking Compositionality in Large Language Modelscited by 33
  10. 2023Baize: An Open-Source Chat Model with Parameter-Efficient Tuning on Self-Chat Datacited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Reasoning Beyond Language: A Comprehensive Survey on Latent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  2. 2025CoT Vectors: Transferring and Probing the Reasoning Mechanisms of LLMs
  3. 2024Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods
  4. 2024Enhancing Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models via Reasoning Patterns
  5. 2026ACIL: Auto Chain of Thoughts for In-Context Learning
  6. 2025Is Chain-of-Thought Reasoning of LLMs a Mirage? A Data Distribution Lens
  7. 2024ChainLM: Empowering Large Language Models with Improved Chain-of-Thought Prompting
  8. 2025To Think or Not to Think: The Hidden Cost of Meta-Training with Excessive CoT Examples