Intelligent Anomaly Detection for Lane Rendering Using Transformer with Self-Supervised Pre-Training and Customized Fine-Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The burgeoning navigation services using digital maps provide great convenience to drivers. Nevertheless, the presence of anomalies in lane rendering map images occasionally introduces potential hazards, as such anomalies can be misleading to human drivers and consequently contribute to unsafe driving conditions. In response to this concern and to accurately and effectively detect the anomalies, this paper transforms lane rendering image anomaly detection into a classification problem and proposes a four-phase pipeline consisting of data pre-processing, self-supervised pre-training with the masked image modeling (MiM) method, customized fine-tuning using cross-entropy based loss with label smoothing, and post-processing to tackle it leveraging state-of-the-art deep learning techniques, especially those involving Transformer models. Various experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed pipeline. Results indicate that the proposed pipeline exhibits superior performance in lane rendering image anomaly detection, and notably, the self-supervised pre-training with MiM can greatly enhance the detection accuracy while significantly reducing the total training time. For instance, employing the Swin Transformer with Uniform Masking as self-supervised pretraining (Swin-Trans-UM) yielded a heightened accuracy at 94.77% and an improved Area Under The Curve (AUC) score of 0.9743 compared with the pure Swin Transformer without pre-training (Swin-Trans) with an accuracy of 94.01% and an AUC of 0.9498. The fine-tuning epochs were dramatically reduced to 41 from the original 280. In conclusion, the proposed pipeline, with its incorporation of self-supervised pre-training using MiM and other advanced deep learning techniques, emerges as a robust solution for enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of lane rendering image anomaly detection in digital navigation systems.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2023.
Builds on
20 of 54 references.
References · 20
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
- 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,375
- 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,962
- 2021SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modelingcited by 1,153
- 2018Image Transformercited by 772
- 2021Attention Mechanisms in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 232
8 more
- 2021Are Large-scale Datasets Necessary for Self-Supervised Pre-training?cited by 117
- 2022Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 87
- 2022Uniform Masking: Enabling MAE Pre-training for Pyramid-based Vision Transformers with Localitycited by 57
- 2020Backpropagated Gradient Representations for Anomaly Detectioncited by 54
- 2017Multi-Label Learning with Global and Local Label Correlationcited by 40
- 2019Anomaly Detection in Road Traffic Using Visual Surveillance: A Surveycited by 30
- 2023Robust Lane Detection through Self Pre-training with Masked Sequential Autoencoders and Fine-tuning with Customized PolyLosscited by 5
- 2022Comparative Study on Supervised versus Semi-supervised Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection of In-vehicle CAN Networkcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.