Golden Gemini is All You Need: Finding the Sweet Spots for Speaker Verification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Previous studies demonstrate the impressive performance of residual neural networks (ResNet) in speaker verification. The ResNet models treat the time and frequency dimensions equally. They follow the default stride configuration designed for image recognition, where the horizontal and vertical axes exhibit similarities. This approach ignores the fact that time and frequency are asymmetric in speech representation. In this paper, we address this issue and look for optimal stride configurations specifically tailored for speaker verification. We represent the stride space on a trellis diagram, and conduct a systematic study on the impact of temporal and frequency resolutions on the performance and further identify two optimal points, namely Golden Gemini, which serves as a guiding principle for designing 2D ResNet-based speaker verification models. By following the principle, a state-of-the-art ResNet baseline model gains a significant performance improvement on VoxCeleb, SITW, and CNCeleb datasets with 7.70%/11.76% average EER/minDCF reductions, respectively, across different network depths (ResNet18, 34, 50, and 101), while reducing the number of parameters by 16.5% and FLOPs by 4.1%. We refer to it as Gemini ResNet. Further investigation reveals the efficacy of the proposed Golden Gemini operating points across various training conditions and architectures. Furthermore, we present a new benchmark, namely the Gemini DF-ResNet, using a cutting-edge model.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2025Nes2Net: A Lightweight Nested Architecture for Foundation Model Driven Speech Anti-spoofingcited by 19
- 2024How Do Neural Spoofing Countermeasures Detect Partially Spoofed Audio?cited by 10
- 2024Speech Foundation Model Ensembles for the Controlled Singing Voice Deepfake Detection (CtrSVDD) Challenge 2024cited by 7
- 2024Towards Quantifying and Reducing Language Mismatch Effects in Cross-Lingual Speech Anti-Spoofingcited by 7
- 2024MASV: Speaker Verification with Global and Local Context Mambacited by 1
- 2025Interpolating Speaker Identities in Embedding Space for Data Expansioncited by 1
- 2024Cosine Scoring with Uncertainty for Neural Speaker Embeddingcited by 0
- 2026MECT: Mixture of Experts with CNN-Transformer Network for Speaker verificationcited by 0
- 2026MECT: Mixture of Experts with CNN-Transformer Network for Speaker verification21 Sep 2026
- 2025Interpolating Speaker Identities in Embedding Space for Data Expansion26 Aug 2025
- 2025Nes2Net: A Lightweight Nested Architecture for Foundation Model Driven Speech Anti-spoofing8 Apr 2025
- 2024MASV: Speaker Verification with Global and Local Context Mamba14 Dec 2024
- 2024Towards Quantifying and Reducing Language Mismatch Effects in Cross-Lingual Speech Anti-Spoofing12 Sep 2024
- 2024Speech Foundation Model Ensembles for the Controlled Singing Voice Deepfake Detection (CtrSVDD) Challenge 20243 Sep 2024
- 2024How Do Neural Spoofing Countermeasures Detect Partially Spoofed Audio?4 Jun 2024
- 2024Cosine Scoring with Uncertainty for Neural Speaker Embedding11 Mar 2024