mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Golden Gemini is All You Need: Finding the Sweet Spots for Speaker Verification

arXiv 2312.03620 ↗First posted 6 Dec 2023eess.AS cs.SDcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Previous studies demonstrate the impressive performance of residual neural networks (ResNet) in speaker verification. The ResNet models treat the time and frequency dimensions equally. They follow the default stride configuration designed for image recognition, where the horizontal and vertical axes exhibit similarities. This approach ignores the fact that time and frequency are asymmetric in speech representation. In this paper, we address this issue and look for optimal stride configurations specifically tailored for speaker verification. We represent the stride space on a trellis diagram, and conduct a systematic study on the impact of temporal and frequency resolutions on the performance and further identify two optimal points, namely Golden Gemini, which serves as a guiding principle for designing 2D ResNet-based speaker verification models. By following the principle, a state-of-the-art ResNet baseline model gains a significant performance improvement on VoxCeleb, SITW, and CNCeleb datasets with 7.70%/11.76% average EER/minDCF reductions, respectively, across different network depths (ResNet18, 34, 50, and 101), while reducing the number of parameters by 16.5% and FLOPs by 4.1%. We refer to it as Gemini ResNet. Further investigation reveals the efficacy of the proposed Golden Gemini operating points across various training conditions and architectures. Furthermore, we present a new benchmark, namely the Gemini DF-ResNet, using a cutting-edge model.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

8 papers.