Physical Symbolic Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a framework for constraining the automatic sequential generation of equations to obey the rules of dimensional analysis by construction. Combining this approach with reinforcement learning, we built Phi-SO, a Physical Symbolic Optimization method for recovering analytical functions from physical data leveraging units constraints. Our symbolic regression algorithm achieves state-of-the-art results in contexts in which variables and constants have known physical units, outperforming all other methods on SRBench's Feynman benchmark in the presence of noise (exceeding 0.1%) and showing resilience even in the presence of significant (10%) levels of noise.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2023.
Builds on
9 of 16 references.
References · 9
- 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 548
- 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 309
- 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 215
- 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 203
- 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 192
- 2020AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitycited by 144
- 2022Symbolic Regression is NP-hardcited by 71
- 2021Analytical Modelling of Exoplanet Transit Specroscopy with Dimensional Analysis and Symbolic Regressioncited by 18
- 2021Improving exploration in policy gradient search: Application to symbolic optimizationcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024Generalizing the SINDy approach with nested neural networks24 Apr 2024