Who Leaked the Model? Tracking IP Infringers in Accountable Federated Learning
On the map: LLM safety and security → Federated unlearning and poisoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) emerges as an effective collaborative learning framework to coordinate data and computation resources from massive and distributed clients in training. Such collaboration results in non-trivial intellectual property (IP) represented by the model parameters that should be protected and shared by the whole party rather than an individual user. Meanwhile, the distributed nature of FL endorses a malicious client the convenience to compromise IP through illegal model leakage to unauthorized third parties. To block such IP leakage, it is essential to make the IP identifiable in the shared model and locate the anonymous infringer who first leaks it. The collective challenges call for accountable federated learning, which requires verifiable ownership of the model and is capable of revealing the infringer's identity upon leakage. In this paper, we propose Decodable Unique Watermarking (DUW) for complying with the requirements of accountable FL. Specifically, before a global model is sent to a client in an FL round, DUW encodes a client-unique key into the model by leveraging a backdoor-based watermark injection. To identify the infringer of a leaked model, DUW examines the model and checks if the triggers can be decoded as the corresponding keys. Extensive empirical results show that DUW is highly effective and robust, achieving over 99% watermark success rate for Digits, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100 datasets under heterogeneous FL settings, and identifying the IP infringer with 100% accuracy even after common watermark removal attempts.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2024Advances and Open Challenges in Federated Foundation Modelscited by 33
- 2025Ten Challenging Problems in Federated Foundation Modelscited by 20
- 2024Synergizing Foundation Models and Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 14
- 2025FIT-Print: Towards False-claim-resistant Model Ownership Verification via Targeted Fingerprintcited by 8
- 2024Bridging Today and the Future of Humanity: AI Safety in 2024 and Beyondcited by 1
- 2025Traceable Black-box Watermarks for Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2025FLClear: Visually Verifiable Multi-Client Watermarking for Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026ZK-Trace: Certified Collusion Tracing with Zero-Knowledge Credentials for Federated GNSS Interference Monitoringcited by 0
- 2026ZK-Trace: Certified Collusion Tracing with Zero-Knowledge Credentials for Federated GNSS Interference Monitoring8 Sep 2026
- 2025FLClear: Visually Verifiable Multi-Client Watermarking for Federated Learning16 Nov 2025
- 2025Traceable Black-box Watermarks for Federated Learning19 May 2025
- 2025Ten Challenging Problems in Federated Foundation Models14 Feb 2025
- 2025FIT-Print: Towards False-claim-resistant Model Ownership Verification via Targeted Fingerprint26 Jan 2025
- 2024Bridging Today and the Future of Humanity: AI Safety in 2024 and Beyond9 Oct 2024
- 2024Synergizing Foundation Models and Federated Learning: A Survey18 Jun 2024
- 2024Advances and Open Challenges in Federated Foundation Models23 Apr 2024