Multi-Weight Ranking for Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cone distribution functions from statistics are turned into Multi-Criteria Decision Making tools. It is demonstrated that this procedure can be considered as an upgrade of the weighted sum scalarization insofar as it absorbs a whole collection of weighted sum scalarizations at once instead of fixing a particular one in advance. As examples show, this type of scalarization--in contrast to a pure weighted sum scalarization-is also able to detect ``non-convex" parts of the Pareto frontier. Situations are characterized in which different types of rank reversal occur, and it is explained why this might even be useful for analyzing the ranking procedure. The ranking functions are then extended to sets providing unary indicators for set preferences which establishes, for the first time, the link between set optimization methods and set-based multi-objective optimization. A potential application in machine learning is outlined.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2023.
Builds on
2 of 38 references.
References · 2
- 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 242
- 2014Set optimization - a rather short introductioncited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.