mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DP-SGD-Global-Adapt-V2-S: Triad Improvements of Privacy, Accuracy and Fairness via Step Decay Noise Multiplier and Step Decay Upper Clipping Threshold

arXiv 2312.02400 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) has become a widely used technique for safeguarding sensitive information in deep learning applications. Unfortunately, DPSGD's per-sample gradient clipping and uniform noise addition during training can significantly degrade model utility and fairness. We observe that the latest DP-SGD-Global-Adapt's average gradient norm is the same throughout the training. Even when it is integrated with the existing linear decay noise multiplier, it has little or no advantage. Moreover, we notice that its upper clipping threshold increases exponentially towards the end of training, potentially impacting the models convergence. Other algorithms, DP-PSAC, Auto-S, DP-SGD-Global, and DP-F, have utility and fairness that are similar to or worse than DP-SGD, as demonstrated in experiments. To overcome these problems and improve utility and fairness, we developed the DP-SGD-Global-Adapt-V2-S. It has a step-decay noise multiplier and an upper clipping threshold that is also decayed step-wise. DP-SGD-Global-Adapt-V2-S with a privacy budget (ε) of 1 improves accuracy by 0.9795%, 0.6786%, and 4.0130% in MNIST, CIFAR10, and CIFAR100, respectively. It also reduces the privacy cost gap (π) by 89.8332% and 60.5541% in unbalanced MNIST and Thinwall datasets, respectively. Finally, we develop mathematical expressions to compute the privacy budget using truncated concentrated differential privacy (tCDP) for DP-SGD-Global-Adapt-V2-T and DP-SGD-Global-Adapt-V2-S.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2023.

Builds on

15 of 63 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  2. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
  3. 2021High-Performance Large-Scale Image Recognition Without Normalizationcited by 359
  4. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  5. 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 306
  6. 2020Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric Perspectivecited by 140
  7. 2022Automatic Clipping: Differentially Private Deep Learning Made Easier and Strongercited by 87
  8. 2020Neither Private Nor Fair: Impact of Data Imbalance on Utility and Fairness in Differential Privacycited by 61
  9. 2018Towards Demystifying Membership Inference Attackscited by 39
  10. 2021On the Convergence and Calibration of Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 36
  11. 2022Normalized/Clipped SGD with Perturbation for Differentially Private Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 35
  12. 2016You are Who You Know and How You Behave: Attribute Inference Attacks via Users' Social Friends and Behaviorscited by 34
3 more
  1. 2021On the (In)Feasibility of Attribute Inference Attacks on Machine Learning Modelscited by 30
  2. 2018Differential Privacy Techniques for Cyber Physical Systems: A Surveycited by 21
  3. 2022Differentially Private Learning with Per-Sample Adaptive Clippingcited by 21

Built on by

Not cited yet.