Universal Deoxidation of Semiconductor Substrates Assisted by Machine-Learning and Real-Time-Feedback-Control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Thin film deposition is an essential step in the semiconductor process. During preparation or loading, the substrate is exposed to the air unavoidably, which has motivated studies of the process control to remove the surface oxide before thin film deposition. Optimizing the deoxidation process in molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) for a random substrate is a multidimensional challenge and sometimes controversial. Due to variations in semiconductor materials and growth processes, the determination of substrate deoxidation temperature is highly dependent on the grower's expertise; the same substrate may yield inconsistent results when evaluated by different growers. Here, we employ a machine learning (ML) hybrid convolution and vision transformer (CNN-ViT) model. This model utilizes reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) video as input to determine the deoxidation status of the substrate as output, enabling automated substrate deoxidation under a controlled architecture. This also extends to the successful application of deoxidation processes on other substrates. Furthermore, we showcase the potential of models trained on data from a single MBE equipment to achieve high-accuracy deployment on other equipment. In contrast to traditional methods, our approach holds exceptional practical value. It standardizes deoxidation temperatures across various equipment and substrate materials, advancing the standardization research process in semiconductor preparation, a significant milestone in thin film growth technology. The concepts and methods demonstrated in this work are anticipated to revolutionize semiconductor manufacturing in optoelectronics and microelectronics industries by applying them to diverse material growth processes.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2023.
Builds on
17 of 38 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,013
- 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
- 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 627
- 2017Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 553
- 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
- 2021Incorporating Convolution Designs into Visual Transformerscited by 248
- 2017Interpretable Learning for Self-Driving Cars by Visualizing Causal Attentioncited by 107
- 2017Clustering with t-SNE, provablycited by 51
- 2018An Analysis of the t-SNE Algorithm for Data Visualizationcited by 49
- 2022Attention Mechanism in Neural Networks: Where it Comes and Where it Goescited by 29
- 2022Visualizing and Understanding Patch Interactions in Vision Transformercited by 26
5 more
- 2019The Receptive Field as a Regularizer in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Acoustic Scene Classificationcited by 22
- 2019The Adversarial Robustness of Samplingcited by 18
- 2017Convolutional Neural Network-Based Block Up-sampling for Intra Frame Codingcited by 10
- 2023Machine-Learning-Assisted and Real-Time-Feedback-Controlled Growth of InAs/GaAs Quantum Dotscited by 5
- 2022Monitoring MBE substrate deoxidation via RHEED image-sequence analysis by deep learningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.