mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

xNeuSM: Explainable Neural Subgraph Matching with Graph Learnable Multi-hop Attention Networks

arXiv 2312.01612 ↗First posted 4 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Subgraph matching is a challenging problem with a wide range of applications in database systems, biochemistry, and cognitive science. It involves determining whether a given query graph is present within a larger target graph. Traditional graph-matching algorithms provide precise results but face challenges in large graph instances due to the NP-complete problem, limiting their practical applicability. In contrast, recent neural network-based approximations offer more scalable solutions, but often lack interpretable node correspondences. To address these limitations, this article presents xNeuSM: Explainable Neural Subgraph Matching which introduces Graph Learnable Multi-hop Attention Networks (GLeMA) that adaptively learns the parameters governing the attention factor decay for each node across hops rather than relying on fixed hyperparameters. We provide a theoretical analysis establishing error bounds for GLeMA's approximation of multi-hop attention as a function of the number of hops. Additionally, we prove that learning distinct attention decay factors for each node leads to a correct approximation of multi-hop attention. Empirical evaluation on real-world datasets shows that xNeuSM achieves substantial improvements in prediction accuracy of up to 34% compared to approximate baselines and, notably, at least a seven-fold faster query time than exact algorithms. The source code of our implementation is available at https://github.com/martinakaduc/xNeuSM.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2023.

Builds on

12 of 40 references.

References · 12

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  5. 2018Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks meet Personalized PageRankcited by 993
  6. 2020TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphscited by 728
  7. 2020PGM-Explainer: Probabilistic Graphical Model Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 211
  8. 2019Cross-lingual Knowledge Graph Alignment via Graph Matching Neural Networkcited by 68
  9. 2020Neural Subgraph Matchingcited by 47
  10. 2023Rethinking Explaining Graph Neural Networks via Non-parametric Subgraph Matchingcited by 8
  11. 2018Convolutional Set Matching for Graph Similaritycited by 7
  12. 2015Efficient Algorithms for Personalized PageRankcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.