mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating the Impact of Flaky Simulators on Testing Autonomous Driving Systems

arXiv 2311.18768 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2023cs.SE cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Simulators are widely used to test Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS), but their potential flakiness can lead to inconsistent test results. We investigate test flakiness in simulation-based testing of ADS by addressing two key questions: (1) How do flaky ADS simulations impact automated testing that relies on randomized algorithms? and (2) Can machine learning (ML) effectively identify flaky ADS tests while decreasing the required number of test reruns? Our empirical results, obtained from two widely-used open-source ADS simulators and five diverse ADS test setups, show that test flakiness in ADS is a common occurrence and can significantly impact the test results obtained by randomized algorithms. Further, our ML classifiers effectively identify flaky ADS tests using only a single test run, achieving F1-scores of 85%, 82% and 96% for three different ADS test setups. Our classifiers significantly outperform our non-ML baseline, which requires executing tests at least twice, by 31%, 21%, and 13% in F1-score performance, respectively. We conclude with a discussion on the scope, implications and limitations of our study. We provide our complete replication package in a Github repository.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2023.

Builds on

12 of 44 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
  2. 2022TransFuser: Imitation with Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Drivingcited by 485
  3. 2021Pylot: A Modular Platform for Exploring Latency-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 33
  4. 2021DeepHyperion: Exploring the Feature Space of Deep Learning-Based Systems through Illumination Searchcited by 29
  5. 2019Comparing Offline and Online Testing of Deep Neural Networks: An Autonomous Car Case Studycited by 27
  6. 2021Can Offline Testing of Deep Neural Networks Replace Their Online Testing?cited by 24
  7. 2021Neural Network Guided Evolutionary Fuzzing for Finding Traffic Violations of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 19
  8. 2022Many-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Online Testing of DNN-Enabled Systemscited by 19
  9. 2022When and Why Test Generators for Deep Learning Produce Invalid Inputs: an Empirical Studycited by 18
  10. 2020Digital Twins Are Not Monozygotic -- Cross-Replicating ADAS Testing in Two Industry-Grade Automotive Simulatorscited by 12
  11. 2020Control Strategies for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 8
  12. 2022Machine Learning-based Test Selection for Simulation-based Testing of Self-driving Cars Softwarecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

4 papers.