mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparison of Autoscaling Frameworks for Containerised Machine-Learning-Applications in a Local and Cloud Environment

arXiv 2311.18659 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2023cs.DCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When deploying machine learning (ML) applications, the automated allocation of computing resources-commonly referred to as autoscaling-is crucial for maintaining a consistent inference time under fluctuating workloads. The objective is to maximize the Quality of Service metrics, emphasizing performance and availability, while minimizing resource costs. In this paper, we compare scalable deployment techniques across three levels of scaling: at the application level (TorchServe, RayServe) and the container level (K3s) in a local environment (production server), as well as at the container and machine levels in a cloud environment (Amazon Web Services Elastic Container Service and Elastic Kubernetes Service). The comparison is conducted through the study of mean and standard deviation of inference time in a multi-client scenario, along with upscaling response times. Based on this analysis, we propose a deployment strategy for both local and cloud-based environments.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.