mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Elucidating Discrepancy in Explanations of Predictive Models Developed using EMR

arXiv 2311.16654 ↗First posted 28 Nov 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The lack of transparency and explainability hinders the clinical adoption of Machine learning (ML) algorithms. While explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods have been proposed, little research has focused on the agreement between these methods and expert clinical knowledge. This study applies current state-of-the-art explainability methods to clinical decision support algorithms developed for Electronic Medical Records (EMR) data to analyse the concordance between these factors and discusses causes for identified discrepancies from a clinical and technical perspective. Important factors for achieving trustworthy XAI solutions for clinical decision support are also discussed.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2023.

Builds on

4 of 7 references.

References · 4

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  2. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  3. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  4. 2019What Clinicians Want: Contextualizing Explainable Machine Learning for Clinical End Usecited by 135

Built on by

Not cited yet.