mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Personalized Predictions of Glioblastoma Infiltration: Mathematical Models, Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Multimodal Scans

arXiv 2311.16536 ↗First posted 28 Nov 2023cs.LG eess.IV q-bio.QMcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Predicting the infiltration of Glioblastoma (GBM) from medical MRI scans is crucial for understanding tumor growth dynamics and designing personalized radiotherapy treatment plans.Mathematical models of GBM growth can complement the data in the prediction of spatial distributions of tumor cells. However, this requires estimating patient-specific parameters of the model from clinical data, which is a challenging inverse problem due to limited temporal data and the limited time between imaging and diagnosis. This work proposes a method that uses Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to estimate patient-specific parameters of a reaction-diffusion PDE model of GBM growth from a single 3D structural MRI snapshot. PINNs embed both the data and the PDE into a loss function, thus integrating theory and data. Key innovations include the identification and estimation of characteristic non-dimensional parameters, a pre-training step that utilizes the non-dimensional parameters and a fine-tuning step to determine the patient specific parameters. Additionally, the diffuse domain method is employed to handle the complex brain geometry within the PINN framework. Our method is validated both on synthetic and patient datasets, and shows promise for real-time parametric inference in the clinical setting for personalized GBM treatment.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2023.

Builds on

19 of 68 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  3. 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 816
  4. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 632
  5. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
  6. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 617
  7. 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 329
  8. 2022Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flowscited by 75
  9. 2021One-Shot Transfer Learning of Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 49
  10. 2020DPM: A Novel Training Method for Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Extrapolationcited by 45
  11. 2021Inverse-Dirichlet Weighting Enables Reliable Training of Physics Informed Neural Networkscited by 43
  12. 2020Multi-Loss Weighting with Coefficient of Variationscited by 36
7 more
  1. 2023Predictive Digital Twin for Optimizing Patient-Specific Radiotherapy Regimens under Uncertainty in High-Grade Gliomascited by 12
  2. 2019Neural parameters estimation for brain tumor growth modelingcited by 11
  3. 2020Multiatlas Calibration of Biophysical Brain Tumor Growth Models with Mass Effectcited by 7
  4. 2021Ensemble inversion for brain tumor growth models with mass effectcited by 5
  5. 2023Patient-specific, mechanistic models of tumor growth incorporating artificial intelligence and big datacited by 5
  6. 2019Image-Driven Biophysical Tumor Growth Model Calibrationcited by 4
  7. 2022A for-loop is all you need. For solving the inverse problem in the case of personalized tumor growth modelingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.