Automated discovery of trade-off between utility, privacy and fairness in machine learning models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning models are deployed as a central component in decision making and policy operations with direct impact on individuals' lives. In order to act ethically and comply with government regulations, these models need to make fair decisions and protect the users' privacy. However, such requirements can come with decrease in models' performance compared to their potentially biased, privacy-leaking counterparts. Thus the trade-off between fairness, privacy and performance of ML models emerges, and practitioners need a way of quantifying this trade-off to enable deployment decisions. In this work we interpret this trade-off as a multi-objective optimization problem, and propose PFairDP, a pipeline that uses Bayesian optimization for discovery of Pareto-optimal points between fairness, privacy and utility of ML models. We show how PFairDP can be used to replicate known results that were achieved through manual constraint setting process. We further demonstrate effectiveness of PFairDP with experiments on multiple models and datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2023.
Builds on
25 of 68 references.
References · 25
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 383
- 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 242
- 2021Bayesian Optimization is Superior to Random Search for Machine Learning Hyperparameter Tuning: Analysis of the Black-Box Optimization Challenge 2020cited by 148
- 2020On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 82
- 2017On Formalizing Fairness in Prediction with Machine Learningcited by 65
- 2019Fair Decision Making using Privacy-Protected Datacited by 58
13 more
- 2022Differential Privacy and Fairness in Decisions and Learning Tasks: A Surveycited by 47
- 2021On the Convergence and Calibration of Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 36
- 2022Trading Off Privacy, Utility and Efficiency in Federated Learningcited by 33
- 2021Investigating Trade-offs in Utility, Fairness and Differential Privacy in Neural Networkscited by 17
- 2019Automatic Discovery of Privacy-Utility Pareto Frontscited by 16
- 2020FaiR-N: Fair and Robust Neural Networks for Structured Datacited by 16
- 2020FAIR: Fair Adversarial Instance Re-weightingcited by 16
- 2018An Economic Analysis of Privacy Protection and Statistical Accuracy as Social Choicescited by 6
- 2021End-To-End Bias Mitigation: Removing Gender Bias in Deep Learningcited by 6
- 2021Architecture Matters: Investigating the Influence of Differential Privacy on Neural Network Designcited by 6
- 2022A penalisation method for batch multi-objective Bayesian optimisation with application in heat exchanger designcited by 5
- 2023(Local) Differential Privacy has NO Disparate Impact on Fairnesscited by 5
- 2019Evaluating Differentially Private Machine Learning in Practicecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.