mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bias-Variance Trade-off in Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Randomized Smoothing for High-Dimensional PDEs

arXiv 2311.15283 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.NAcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been proven effective for low-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs), the computational cost remains a hurdle in high-dimensional scenarios. This is particularly pronounced when computing high-order and high-dimensional derivatives in the physics-informed loss. Randomized Smoothing PINN (RS-PINN) introduces Gaussian noise for stochastic smoothing of the original neural net model, enabling Monte Carlo methods for derivative approximation, eliminating the need for costly auto-differentiation. Despite its computational efficiency in high dimensions, RS-PINN introduces biases in both loss and gradients, negatively impacting convergence, especially when coupled with stochastic gradient descent (SGD). We present a comprehensive analysis of biases in RS-PINN, attributing them to the nonlinearity of the Mean Squared Error (MSE) loss and the PDE nonlinearity. We propose tailored bias correction techniques based on the order of PDE nonlinearity. The unbiased RS-PINN allows for a detailed examination of its pros and cons compared to the biased version. Specifically, the biased version has a lower variance and runs faster than the unbiased version, but it is less accurate due to the bias. To optimize the bias-variance trade-off, we combine the two approaches in a hybrid method that balances the rapid convergence of the biased version with the high accuracy of the unbiased version. In addition, we present an enhanced implementation of RS-PINN. Extensive experiments on diverse high-dimensional PDEs, including Fokker-Planck, HJB, viscous Burgers', Allen-Cahn, and Sine-Gordon equations, illustrate the bias-variance trade-off and highlight the effectiveness of the hybrid RS-PINN. Empirical guidelines are provided for selecting biased, unbiased, or hybrid versions, depending on the dimensionality and nonlinearity of the specific PDE problem.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2023.

Builds on

19 of 39 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  2. 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 678
  3. 2017Solving high-dimensional partial differential equations using deep learningcited by 556
  4. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 468
  5. 2021Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse designcited by 280
  6. 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 234
  7. 2017Deep learning-based numerical methods for high-dimensional parabolic partial differential equations and backward stochastic differential equationscited by 191
  8. 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating PDEscited by 116
  9. 2021CAN-PINN: A Fast Physics-Informed Neural Network Based on Coupled-Automatic-Numerical Differentiation Methodcited by 93
  10. 2023How Does Information Bottleneck Help Deep Learning?cited by 93
  11. 2020Solving high-dimensional Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman PDEs using neural networks: perspectives from the theory of controlled diffusions and measures on path spacecited by 82
  12. 2023Tackling the Curse of Dimensionality with Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 79
7 more
  1. 2017Machine learning approximation algorithms for high-dimensional fully nonlinear partial differential equations and second-order backward stochastic differential equationscited by 65
  2. 2021When Do Extended Physics-Informed Neural Networks (XPINNs) Improve Generalization?cited by 58
  3. 2018Forward-Backward Stochastic Neural Networks: Deep Learning of High-dimensional Partial Differential Equationscited by 55
  4. 2019Deep splitting method for parabolic PDEscited by 53
  5. 2018Machine Learning for semi linear PDEscited by 28
  6. 2022Learning Physics-Informed Neural Networks without Stacked Back-propagationcited by 23
  7. 2019Three algorithms for solving high-dimensional fully-coupled FBSDEs through deep learningcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 6; 2026: 6.

19 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Hutchinson Trace Estimation for High-Dimensional and High-Order Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 23
  2. 2024Score-Based Physics-Informed Neural Networks for High-Dimensional Fokker-Planck Equationscited by 22
  3. 2024Stochastic Taylor Derivative Estimator: Efficient amortization for arbitrary differential operatorscited by 20
  4. 2025QCPINN: Quantum-Classical Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving PDEscited by 9
  5. 2025ProPINN: Demystifying Propagation Failures in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 6
  6. 2024Tackling the Curse of Dimensionality in Fractional and Tempered Fractional PDEs with Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 5
  7. 2024Physics-informed Neural Networks for Functional Differential Equations: Cylindrical Approximation and Its Convergence Guaranteescited by 5
  8. 2025A Conformal Prediction Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 5
  9. 2025Noisy PDE Training Requires Bigger PINNscited by 2
  10. 2024Score-fPINN: Fractional Score-Based Physics-Informed Neural Networks for High-Dimensional Fokker-Planck-Levy Equationscited by 1
  11. 2025Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Various-Grained Low-Rank Projection of Gradientscited by 1
  12. 2026Deep Neural networks for solving high-dimensional parabolic partial differential equationscited by 1
7 more
  1. 2024Improving PINNs By Algebraic Inclusion of Boundary and Initial Conditionscited by 0
  2. 2025Intrinsic-Metric Physics-Informed Neural Networks (IM-PINN) for Reaction-Diffusion Dynamics on Complex Riemannian Manifoldscited by 0
  3. 2026Stochastic Dimension Zeroth-Order Estimator: Stable and Memory-Efficient Training of PINNscited by 0
  4. 2026Stochastic Dimension Implicit Functional Projections for Global Integral Conservation in High-Dimensional PINNscited by 0
  5. 2026Stochastic-Dimension Frozen Sampled Neural Network for High-Dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii Equations on Unbounded Domainscited by 0
  6. 2026Unbiased and Second-Order-Free Training for High-Dimensional PDEscited by 0
  7. 2026Hierarchical rank-evolving representation for physics-informed neural networkscited by 0