mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating Large Language Models through Gender and Racial Stereotypes

arXiv 2311.14788 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language Models have ushered a new age of AI gaining traction within the NLP community as well as amongst the general population. AI's ability to make predictions, generations and its applications in sensitive decision-making scenarios, makes it even more important to study these models for possible biases that may exist and that can be exaggerated. We conduct a quality comparative study and establish a framework to evaluate language models under the premise of two kinds of biases: gender and race, in a professional setting. We find out that while gender bias has reduced immensely in newer models, as compared to older ones, racial bias still exists.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2023.

Builds on

7 of 14 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  6. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  7. 2020Unmasking Contextual Stereotypes: Measuring and Mitigating BERT's Gender Biascited by 82

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.