Unveiling The Factors of Aesthetic Preferences with Explainable AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The allure of aesthetic appeal in images captivates our senses, yet the underlying intricacies of aesthetic preferences remain elusive. In this study, we pioneer a novel perspective by utilizing several different machine learning (ML) models that focus on aesthetic attributes known to influence preferences. Our models process these attributes as inputs to predict the aesthetic scores of images. Moreover, to delve deeper and obtain interpretable explanations regarding the factors driving aesthetic preferences, we utilize the popular Explainable AI (XAI) technique known as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Our methodology compares the performance of various ML models, including Random Forest, XGBoost, Support Vector Regression, and Multilayer Perceptron, in accurately predicting aesthetic scores, and consistently observing results in conjunction with SHAP. We conduct experiments on three image aesthetic benchmarks, namely Aesthetics with Attributes Database (AADB), Explainable Visual Aesthetics (EVA), and Personalized image Aesthetics database with Rich Attributes (PARA), providing insights into the roles of attributes and their interactions. Finally, our study presents ML models for aesthetics research, alongside the introduction of XAI. Our aim is to shed light on the complex nature of aesthetic preferences in images through ML and to provide a deeper understanding of the attributes that influence aesthetic judgements.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2023.
Builds on
18 of 65 references.
References · 18
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 389
- 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 355
- 2016Photo Aesthetics Ranking Network with Attributes and Content Adaptationcited by 125
- 2020On the Tractability of SHAP Explanationscited by 92
- 2022Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment with Rich Attributescited by 58
- 2016Image Aesthetic Assessment: An Experimental Surveycited by 50
6 more
- 2021Explainable AI: current status and future directionscited by 33
- 2020A Comparison of Optimization Algorithms for Deep Learningcited by 23
- 2021Composition and Style Attributes Guided Image Aesthetic Assessmentcited by 9
- 2020Deep Ordinal Regression using Optimal Transport Loss and Unimodal Output Probabilitiescited by 5
- 2022Combining Counterfactuals With Shapley Values To Explain Image Modelscited by 4
- 2023Multi-task convolutional neural network for image aesthetic assessmentcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.