New Epochs in AI Supervision: Design and Implementation of an Autonomous Radiology AI Monitoring System
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the increasingly widespread adoption of AI in healthcare, maintaining the accuracy and reliability of AI models in clinical practice has become crucial. In this context, we introduce novel methods for monitoring the performance of radiology AI classification models in practice, addressing the challenges of obtaining real-time ground truth for performance monitoring. We propose two metrics - predictive divergence and temporal stability - to be used for preemptive alerts of AI performance changes. Predictive divergence, measured using Kullback-Leibler and Jensen-Shannon divergences, evaluates model accuracy by comparing predictions with those of two supplementary models. Temporal stability is assessed through a comparison of current predictions against historical moving averages, identifying potential model decay or data drift. This approach was retrospectively validated using chest X-ray data from a single-center imaging clinic, demonstrating its effectiveness in maintaining AI model reliability. By providing continuous, real-time insights into model performance, our system ensures the safe and effective use of AI in clinical decision-making, paving the way for more robust AI integration in healthcare
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2023.
Builds on
3 of 22 references.
References · 3
- 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 243
- 2022Reliable and Resilient AI and IoT-based Personalised Healthcare Services: A Surveycited by 2
- 2023Effects of data time lag in a decision-making system using machine learning for pork price predictioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.