Studying Artist Sentiments around AI-generated Artwork
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Art created using generated Artificial Intelligence has taken the world by storm and generated excitement for many digital creators and technologists. However, the reception and reaction from artists have been mixed. Concerns about plagiarizing their artworks and styles for datasets and uncertainty around the future of digital art sparked movements in artist communities shunning the use of AI for generating art and protecting artists' rights. Collaborating with these tools for novel creative use cases also sparked hope from some creators. Artists are an integral stakeholder in the rapidly evolving digital creativity industry and understanding their concerns and hopes inform responsible development and use of creativity support tools. In this work, we study artists' sentiments about AI-generated art. We interviewed 7 artists and analyzed public posts from artists on social media platforms Reddit, Twitter and Artstation. We report artists' main concerns and hopes around AI-generated artwork, informing a way forward for inclusive development of these tools.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2023.
Builds on
6 of 9 references.
References · 6
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,527
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
- 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,555
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024At the edge of a generative cultural precipicecited by 0
- 2024At the edge of a generative cultural precipice30 Apr 2024