Attention Deficit is Ordered! Fooling Deformable Vision Transformers with Collaborative Adversarial Patches
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The latest generation of transformer-based vision models has proven to be superior to Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based models across several vision tasks, largely attributed to their remarkable prowess in relation modeling. Deformable vision transformers significantly reduce the quadratic complexity of attention modeling by using sparse attention structures, enabling them to incorporate features across different scales and be used in large-scale applications, such as multi-view vision systems. Recent work has demonstrated adversarial attacks against conventional vision transformers; we show that these attacks do not transfer to deformable transformers due to their sparse attention structure. Specifically, attention in deformable transformers is modeled using pointers to the most relevant other tokens. In this work, we contribute for the first time adversarial attacks that manipulate the attention of deformable transformers, redirecting it to focus on irrelevant parts of the image. We also develop new collaborative attacks where a source patch manipulates attention to point to a target patch, which contains the adversarial noise to fool the model. In our experiments, we observe that altering less than 1% of the patched area in the input field results in a complete drop to 0% AP in single-view object detection using MS COCO and a 0% MODA in multi-view object detection using Wildtrack.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2023.
Builds on
23 of 24 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,422
- 2017Deformable Convolutional Networkscited by 1,488
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
- 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,013
- 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 460
11 more
- 2021Understanding Robustness of Transformers for Image Classificationcited by 249
- 2019Pay Less Attention with Lightweight and Dynamic Convolutionscited by 211
- 2021Are Transformers More Robust Than CNNs?cited by 187
- 2021On the Robustness of Vision Transformers to Adversarial Examplescited by 167
- 2021On the Adversarial Robustness of Vision Transformerscited by 106
- 2021Towards Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Vision Transformerscited by 80
- 2021Adversarial Robustness Comparison of Vision Transformer and MLP-Mixer to CNNscited by 57
- 2022Patch-Fool: Are Vision Transformers Always Robust Against Adversarial Perturbations?cited by 49
- 2021Multiview Detection with Shadow Transformer (and View-Coherent Data Augmentation)cited by 45
- 2021Reveal of Vision Transformers Robustness against Adversarial Attackscited by 43
- 2022Give Me Your Attention: Dot-Product Attention Considered Harmful for Adversarial Patch Robustnesscited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.