mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Energy efficiency in Edge TPU vs. embedded GPU for computer-aided medical imaging segmentation and classification

arXiv 2311.12876 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2023eess.IV cs.AI cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we evaluate the energy usage of fully embedded medical diagnosis aids based on both segmentation and classification of medical images implemented on Edge TPU and embedded GPU processors. We use glaucoma diagnosis based on color fundus images as an example to show the possibility of performing segmentation and classification in real time on embedded boards and to highlight the different energy requirements of the studied implementations. Several other works develop the use of segmentation and feature extraction techniques to detect glaucoma, among many other pathologies, with deep neural networks. Memory limitations and low processing capabilities of embedded accelerated systems (EAS) limit their use for deep network-based system training. However, including specific acceleration hardware, such as NVIDIA's Maxwell GPU or Google's Edge TPU, enables them to perform inferences using complex pre-trained networks in very reasonable times. In this study, we evaluate the timing and energy performance of two EAS equipped with Machine Learning (ML) accelerators executing an example diagnostic tool developed in a previous work. For optic disc (OD) and cup (OC) segmentation, the obtained prediction times per image are under 29 and 43 ms using Edge TPUs and Maxwell GPUs, respectively. Prediction times for the classification subsystem are lower than 10 and 14 ms for Edge TPUs and Maxwell GPUs, respectively. Regarding energy usage, in approximate terms, for OD segmentation Edge TPUs and Maxwell GPUs use 38 and 190 mJ per image, respectively. For fundus classification, Edge TPUs and Maxwell GPUs use 45 and 70 mJ, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2023.

Builds on

12 of 37 references.

References · 12

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  5. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
  6. 2019Deep learning for cardiac image segmentation: A reviewcited by 131
  7. 2018Benchmark Analysis of Representative Deep Neural Network Architecturescited by 77
  8. 2021DeepEdgeBench: Benchmarking Deep Neural Networks on Edge Devicescited by 26
  9. 2017Optic Disc and Cup Segmentation Methods for Glaucoma Detection with Modification of U-Net Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 16
  10. 2018Embedded deep learning in ophthalmology: Making ophthalmic imaging smartercited by 3
  11. 2022A Study on the Use of Edge TPUs for Eye Fundus Image Segmentationcited by 3
  12. 2022Understanding the role of single-board computers in engineering and computer science education: A systematic literature reviewcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.