Targeted Activation Penalties Help CNNs Ignore Spurious Signals
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks (NNs) can learn to rely on spurious signals in the training data, leading to poor generalisation. Recent methods tackle this problem by training NNs with additional ground-truth annotations of such signals. These methods may, however, let spurious signals re-emerge in deep convolutional NNs (CNNs). We propose Targeted Activation Penalty (TAP), a new method tackling the same problem by penalising activations to control the re-emergence of spurious signals in deep CNNs, while also lowering training times and memory usage. In addition, ground-truth annotations can be expensive to obtain. We show that TAP still works well with annotations generated by pre-trained models as effective substitutes of ground-truth annotations. We demonstrate the power of TAP against two state-of-the-art baselines on the MNIST benchmark and on two clinical image datasets, using four different CNN architectures.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2023.
Builds on
21 of 29 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2016Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfercited by 1,059
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
- 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 374
9 more
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
- 2018Women also Snowboard: Overcoming Bias in Captioning Modelscited by 236
- 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
- 2020Making deep neural networks right for the right scientific reasons by interacting with their explanationscited by 141
- 2018Knowledge Transfer with Jacobian Matchingcited by 73
- 2016Auditing Black-box Models for Indirect Influencecited by 41
- 2022Impact of Feedback Type on Explanatory Interactive Learningcited by 7
- 2023Use Perturbations when Learning from Explanationscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.