mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

H-COAL: Human Correction of AI-Generated Labels for Biomedical Named Entity Recognition

arXiv 2311.11981 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2023cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid advancement of machine learning models for NLP tasks, collecting high-fidelity labels from AI models is a realistic possibility. Firms now make AI available to customers via predictions as a service (PaaS). This includes PaaS products for healthcare. It is unclear whether these labels can be used for training a local model without expensive annotation checking by in-house experts. In this work, we propose a new framework for Human Correction of AI-Generated Labels (H-COAL). By ranking AI-generated outputs, one can selectively correct labels and approach gold standard performance (100% human labeling) with significantly less human effort. We show that correcting 5% of labels can close the AI-human performance gap by up to 64% relative improvement, and correcting 20% of labels can close the performance gap by up to 86% relative improvement.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2023.

Builds on

8 of 23 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  2. 2019Publicly Available Clinical BERT Embeddingscited by 995
  3. 2021A Survey of Human-in-the-loop for Machine Learningcited by 214
  4. 2019Competence-based Curriculum Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 201
  5. 2021Want To Reduce Labeling Cost? GPT-3 Can Helpcited by 196
  6. 2017Deep Active Learning for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 108
  7. 2020Dynamic Data Selection for Curriculum Learning via Ability Estimationcited by 21
  8. 2022The Expertise Problem: Learning from Specialized Feedbackcited by 20

Built on by

Not cited yet.