mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploring Prompting Large Language Models as Explainable Metrics

arXiv 2311.11552 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper describes the IUST NLP Lab submission to the Prompting Large Language Models as Explainable Metrics Shared Task at the Eval4NLP 2023 Workshop on Evaluation & Comparison of NLP Systems. We have proposed a zero-shot prompt-based strategy for explainable evaluation of the summarization task using Large Language Models (LLMs). The conducted experiments demonstrate the promising potential of LLMs as evaluation metrics in Natural Language Processing (NLP), particularly in the field of summarization. Both few-shot and zero-shot approaches are employed in these experiments. The performance of our best provided prompts achieved a Kendall correlation of 0.477 with human evaluations in the text summarization task on the test data. Code and results are publicly available on GitHub.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2023.

Builds on

7 of 13 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  3. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
  4. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
  5. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 420
  6. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 416
  7. 2023The Eval4NLP 2023 Shared Task on Prompting Large Language Models as Explainable Metricscited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.