mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Variation in Subpopulation Susceptibility to Poisoning Attacks

arXiv 2311.11544 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning is susceptible to poisoning attacks, in which an attacker controls a small fraction of the training data and chooses that data with the goal of inducing some behavior unintended by the model developer in the trained model. We consider a realistic setting in which the adversary with the ability to insert a limited number of data points attempts to control the model's behavior on a specific subpopulation. Inspired by previous observations on disparate effectiveness of random label-flipping attacks on different subpopulations, we investigate the properties that can impact the effectiveness of state-of-the-art poisoning attacks against different subpopulations. For a family of 2-dimensional synthetic datasets, we empirically find that dataset separability plays a dominant role in subpopulation vulnerability for less separable datasets. However, well-separated datasets exhibit more dependence on individual subpopulation properties. We further discover that a crucial subpopulation property is captured by the difference in loss on the clean dataset between the clean model and a target model that misclassifies the subpopulation, and a subpopulation is much easier to attack if the loss difference is small. This property also generalizes to high-dimensional benchmark datasets. For the Adult benchmark dataset, we show that we can find semantically-meaningful subpopulation properties that are related to the susceptibilities of a selected group of subpopulations. The results in this paper are accompanied by a fully interactive web-based visualization of subpopulation poisoning attacks found at https://uvasrg.github.io/visualizing-poisoning

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2023.

Builds on

16 of 31 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  3. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
  4. 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 426
  5. 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 288
  6. 2023Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practicalcited by 276
  7. 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 233
  8. 2019Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approachescited by 181
  9. 2020Witches' Brew: Industrial Scale Data Poisoning via Gradient Matchingcited by 156
  10. 2019Transferable Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Deep Neural Netscited by 129
  11. 2018Stronger Data Poisoning Attacks Break Data Sanitization Defensescited by 125
  12. 2020MetaPoison: Practical General-purpose Clean-label Data Poisoningcited by 114
4 more
  1. 2020Subpopulation Data Poisoning Attackscited by 68
  2. 2020Poisoning Attacks on Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 58
  3. 2020On Adversarial Bias and the Robustness of Fair Machine Learningcited by 36
  4. 2022Lethal Dose Conjecture on Data Poisoningcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.