Fine-Tuning Adaptive Stochastic Optimizers: Determining the Optimal Hyperparameter ε via Gradient Magnitude Histogram Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Stochastic optimizers play a crucial role in the successful training of deep neural network models. To achieve optimal model performance, designers must carefully select both model and optimizer hyperparameters. However, this process is frequently demanding in terms of computational resources and processing time. While it is a well-established practice to tune the entire set of optimizer hyperparameters for peak performance, there is still a lack of clarity regarding the individual influence of hyperparameters mislabeled as "low priority", including the safeguard factor ε and decay rate β, in leading adaptive stochastic optimizers like the Adam optimizer. In this manuscript, we introduce a new framework based on the empirical probability density function of the loss' gradient magnitude, termed as the "gradient magnitude histogram", for a thorough analysis of adaptive stochastic optimizers and the safeguard hyperparameter ε. This framework reveals and justifies valuable relationships and dependencies among hyperparameters in connection to optimal performance across diverse tasks, such as classification, language modeling and machine translation. Furthermore, we propose a novel algorithm using gradient magnitude histograms to automatically estimate a refined and accurate search space for the optimal safeguard hyperparameter ε, surpassing the conventional trial-and-error methodology by establishing a worst-case search space that is two times narrower.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2023.
Builds on
26 of 53 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
- 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 943
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 841
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
14 more
- 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 786
- 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 772
- 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 629
- 2014Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimizationcited by 289
- 2020AdaBelief Optimizer: Adapting Stepsizes by the Belief in Observed Gradientscited by 283
- 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 280
- 2017The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine Learningcited by 250
- 2019On Empirical Comparisons of Optimizers for Deep Learningcited by 103
- 2018Quasi-hyperbolic momentum and Adam for deep learningcited by 48
- 2018Aggregated Momentum: Stability Through Passive Dampingcited by 36
- 2020The Hidden Convex Optimization Landscape of Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networks: an Exact Characterization of the Optimal Solutionscited by 30
- 2019diffGrad: An Optimization Method for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 29
- 2019Domain-independent Dominance of Adaptive Methodscited by 13
- 2021Rethinking Adam: A Twofold Exponential Moving Average Approachcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.