mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Systems-Theoretical Formalization of Closed Systems

arXiv 2311.10786 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2023cs.AI cs.SY eess.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is a lack of formalism for some key foundational concepts in systems engineering. One of the most recently acknowledged deficits is the inadequacy of systems engineering practices for engineering intelligent systems. In our previous works, we proposed that closed systems precepts could be used to accomplish a required paradigm shift for the systems engineering of intelligent systems. However, to enable such a shift, formal foundations for closed systems precepts that expand the theory of systems engineering are needed. The concept of closure is a critical concept in the formalism underlying closed systems precepts. In this paper, we provide formal, systems- and information-theoretic definitions of closure to identify and distinguish different types of closed systems. Then, we assert a mathematical framework to evaluate the subjective formation of the boundaries and constraints of such systems. Finally, we argue that engineering an intelligent system can benefit from appropriate closed and open systems paradigms on multiple levels of abstraction of the system. In the main, this framework will provide the necessary fundamentals to aid in systems engineering of intelligent systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2023.

Builds on

1 of 42 references.

References · 1

  1. 2022Core and Periphery as Closed-System Precepts for Engineering General Intelligencecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.