mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GroupMixer: Patch-based Group Convolutional Neural Network for Breast Cancer Detection from Histopathological Images

arXiv 2311.09846 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2023eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Diagnosis of breast cancer malignancy at the early stages is a crucial step for controlling its side effects. Histopathological analysis provides a unique opportunity for malignant breast cancer detection. However, such a task would be tedious and time-consuming for the histopathologists. Deep Neural Networks enable us to learn informative features directly from raw histopathological images without manual feature extraction. Although Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been the dominant architectures in the computer vision realm, Transformer-based architectures have shown promising results in different computer vision tasks. Although harnessing the capability of Transformer-based architectures for medical image analysis seems interesting, these architectures are large, have a significant number of trainable parameters, and require large datasets to be trained on, which are usually rare in the medical domain. It has been claimed and empirically proved that at least part of the superior performance of Transformer-based architectures in Computer Vision domain originates from patch embedding operation. In this paper, we borrowed the previously introduced idea of integrating a fully Convolutional Neural Network architecture with Patch Embedding operation and presented an efficient CNN architecture for breast cancer malignancy detection from histopathological images. Despite the number of parameters that is significantly smaller than other methods, the accuracy performance metrics achieved 97.65%, 98.92%, 99.21%, and 98.01% for 40x, 100x, 200x, and 400x magnifications respectively. We took a step forward and modified the architecture using Group Convolution and Channel Shuffling ideas and reduced the number of trainable parameters even more with a negligible decline in performance and achieved 95.42%, 98.16%, 96.05%, and 97.92% accuracy for the mentioned magnifications respectively.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2023.

Builds on

11 of 36 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  5. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  6. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  7. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  8. 2017ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devicescited by 1,200
  9. 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,136
  10. 2023Computational Pathology: A Survey Review and The Way Forwardcited by 30
  11. 2022HistoKT: Cross Knowledge Transfer in Computational Pathologycited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.