Neuro-Symbolic Integration Brings Causal and Reliable Reasoning Proofs
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Two lines of approaches are adopted for complex reasoning with LLMs. One line of work prompts LLMs with various reasoning structures, while the structural outputs can be naturally regarded as intermediate reasoning steps. Another line of work adopt LLM-free declarative solvers to do the reasoning task, rendering higher reasoning accuracy but lacking interpretability due to the black-box nature of the solvers. Aiming to resolve the trade-off between answer accuracy and interpretability, we present a simple extension to the latter line of work. Specifically, we showcase that the intermediate search logs generated by Prolog interpreters can be accessed and interpreted into human-readable reasoning proofs. As long as LLMs correctly translate problem descriptions into Prolog representations, the corresponding reasoning proofs are ensured to be causal and reliable. On two logical reasoning and one arithmetic reasoning datasets, our framework obtains significant improvements in terms of both answer accuracy and reasoning proof accuracy. Our code is released at https://github.com/DAMO-NLP-SG/CaRing
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2023.
Builds on
11 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2023DetermLR: Augmenting LLM-based Logical Reasoning from Indeterminacy to Determinacy28 Oct
- 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code24 Aug
- 2023Cumulative Reasoning with Large Language Models8 Aug
- 2023Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoning20 May
Other references · 7
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 873
- 2023Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 285
- 2023Large Language Model Guided Tree-of-Thoughtcited by 218
- 2021Improving Coherence and Consistency in Neural Sequence Models with Dual-System, Neuro-Symbolic Reasoningcited by 85
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Delta1 with LLM: symbolic and neural integration for credible and explainable reasoning
- 2024A Closer Look at Logical Reasoning with LLMs: The Choice of Tool Matters
- 2024Leveraging LLMs for Hypothetical Deduction in Logical Inference: A Neuro-Symbolic Approach
- 2026SymDiag: Explainable Diagnosis for LLM Reasoning via Neuro-Symbolic Verification
- 2026Logic-Parametric Neuro-Symbolic NLI: Controlling Logical Formalisms for Verifiable LLM Reasoning
- 2024Proof of Thought : Neurosymbolic Program Synthesis allows Robust and Interpretable Reasoning
- 2025Intermediate Languages Matter: Formal Languages and LLMs affect Neurosymbolic Reasoning
- 2022Evaluating Step-by-Step Reasoning through Symbolic Verification