Breaking Boundaries: Balancing Performance and Robustness in Deep Wireless Traffic Forecasting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Balancing the trade-off between accuracy and robustness is a long-standing challenge in time series forecasting. While most of existing robust algorithms have achieved certain suboptimal performance on clean data, sustaining the same performance level in the presence of data perturbations remains extremely hard. In this paper, we study a wide array of perturbation scenarios and propose novel defense mechanisms against adversarial attacks using real-world telecom data. We compare our strategy against two existing adversarial training algorithms under a range of maximal allowed perturbations, defined using ℓ∞-norm, ∈ [0.1,0.4]. Our findings reveal that our hybrid strategy, which is composed of a classifier to detect adversarial examples, a denoiser to eliminate noise from the perturbed data samples, and a standard forecaster, achieves the best performance on both clean and perturbed data. Our optimal model can retain up to 92.02% the performance of the original forecasting model in terms of Mean Squared Error (MSE) on clean data, while being more robust than the standard adversarially trained models on perturbed data. Its MSE is 2.71× and 2.51× lower than those of comparing methods on normal and perturbed data, respectively. In addition, the components of our models can be trained in parallel, resulting in better computational efficiency. Our results indicate that we can optimally balance the trade-off between the performance and robustness of forecasting models by improving the classifier and denoiser, even in the presence of sophisticated and destructive poisoning attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2023.
Builds on
38 of 71 references.
References · 38
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,447
- 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
- 2017DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networkscited by 1,004
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
- 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
- 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 656
- 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 439
26 more
- 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 312
- 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 288
- 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 275
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
- 2015Doctor AI: Predicting Clinical Events via Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 205
- 2017Conditional Time Series Forecasting with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 121
- 2018Deep Learning in Mobile and Wireless Networking: A Surveycited by 117
- 2018Is feature selection secure against training data poisoning?cited by 88
- 2019Deep Factors for Forecastingcited by 86
- 2016Data Poisoning Attacks on Factorization-Based Collaborative Filteringcited by 78
- 2017MagNet and "Efficient Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks" are Not Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 46
- 2021Detecting Adversarial Examples Is (Nearly) As Hard As Classifying Themcited by 46
- 2019Adversarial Attacks on Time Seriescited by 40
- 2017Security Evaluation of Pattern Classifiers under Attackcited by 39
- 2021Evading Adversarial Example Detection Defenses with Orthogonal Projected Gradient Descentcited by 34
- 2022Practical Adversarial Attacks on Spatiotemporal Traffic Forecasting Modelscited by 28
- 2018Logit Pairing Methods Can Fool Gradient-Based Attackscited by 27
- 2019Label Smoothing and Logit Squeezing: A Replacement for Adversarial Training?cited by 18
- 2022Robust Multivariate Time-Series Forecasting: Adversarial Attacks and Defense Mechanismscited by 8
- 2020The Dilemma Between Data Transformations and Adversarial Robustness for Time Series Application Systemscited by 6
- 2021Addressing Adversarial Machine Learning Attacks in Smart Healthcare Perspectivescited by 4
- 2020Artificial Intelligence for 5G Wireless Systems: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Research Directionscited by 3
- 2018An Optimal Control View of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 2
- 2021Adversarial attacks against Bayesian forecasting dynamic modelscited by 2
- 2018ASP:A Fast Adversarial Attack Example Generation Framework based on Adversarial Saliency Predictioncited by 1
- 2019Adversarial Training: embedding adversarial perturbations into the parameter space of a neural network to build a robust systemcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Deep Learning Network-Temporal Models For Traffic Prediction12 Mar 2026