Large Language Models are Few-Shot Training Example Generators: A Case Study in Fallacy Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recognizing fallacies is crucial for ensuring the quality and validity of arguments across various domains. However, computational fallacy recognition faces challenges due to the diverse genres, domains, and types of fallacies found in datasets. This leads to a highly multi-class, and even multi-label, setup with substantial class imbalance. In this study, we aim to enhance existing models for fallacy recognition by incorporating additional context and by leveraging large language models to generate synthetic data, thus increasing the representation of the infrequent classes. We experiment with GPT3.5 to generate synthetic examples and we examine the impact of prompt settings for this. Moreover, we explore zero-shot and few-shot scenarios to evaluate the effectiveness of using the generated examples for training smaller models within a unified fallacy recognition framework. Furthermore, we analyze the overlap between the synthetic data and existing fallacy datasets. Finally, we investigate the usefulness of providing supplementary context for detecting fallacy types that need such context, e.g., diversion fallacies. Our evaluation results demonstrate consistent improvements across fallacy types, datasets, and generators. The code and the synthetic datasets are all publicly available.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2023.
Builds on
33 of 54 references.
References · 33
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
- 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 668
21 more
- 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 486
- 2017The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learningcited by 368
- 2022ZeroGen: Efficient Zero-shot Learning via Dataset Generationcited by 209
- 2023AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotatorscited by 171
- 2023GPT-NER: Named Entity Recognition via Large Language Modelscited by 158
- 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Articlescited by 130
- 2023Can ChatGPT Reproduce Human-Generated Labels? A Study of Social Computing Taskscited by 88
- 2022AugESC: Dialogue Augmentation with Large Language Models for Emotional Support Conversationcited by 79
- 2023LLMaAA: Making Large Language Models as Active Annotatorscited by 78
- 2021Towards Zero-Label Language Learningcited by 76
- 2021Medically Aware GPT-3 as a Data Generator for Medical Dialogue Summarizationcited by 76
- 2023PLACES: Prompting Language Models for Social Conversation Synthesiscited by 72
- 2021Language Model as an Annotator: Exploring DialoGPT for Dialogue Summarizationcited by 46
- 2023Large Language Models as Annotators: Enhancing Generalization of NLP Models at Minimal Costcited by 33
- 2018Before Name-calling: Dynamics and Triggers of Ad Hominem Fallacies in Web Argumentationcited by 32
- 2017Argotario: Computational Argumentation Meets Serious Gamescited by 29
- 2023PromptMix: A Class Boundary Augmentation Method for Large Language Model Distillationcited by 25
- 2023Selective In-Context Data Augmentation for Intent Detection using Pointwise V-Informationcited by 24
- 2023How susceptible are LLMs to Logical Fallacies?cited by 23
- 2023Multitask Instruction-based Prompting for Fallacy Recognitioncited by 22
- 2023ArAIEval Shared Task: Persuasion Techniques and Disinformation Detection in Arabic Textcited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Missci: Reconstructing Fallacies in Misrepresented Sciencecited by 14
- 2024Are LLMs Good Zero-Shot Fallacy Classifiers?cited by 10
- 2024Assessing the Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs in the context of Evidence-based Claim Verificationcited by 9
- 2024PropaInsight: Toward Deeper Understanding of Propaganda in Terms of Techniques, Appeals, and Intentcited by 9
- 2026Beyond Logical Forms: LLM-Extracted Patterns for Fallacy Classificationcited by 1
- 2026Beyond Logical Forms: LLM-Extracted Patterns for Fallacy Classification25 Jun 2026
- 2024Are LLMs Good Zero-Shot Fallacy Classifiers?19 Oct 2024
- 2024PropaInsight: Toward Deeper Understanding of Propaganda in Terms of Techniques, Appeals, and Intent19 Sep 2024
- 2024Missci: Reconstructing Fallacies in Misrepresented Science5 Jun 2024
- 2024Assessing the Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs in the context of Evidence-based Claim Verification16 Feb 2024