Human-in-the-loop: Towards Label Embeddings for Measuring Classification Difficulty
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Uncertainty in machine learning models is a timely and vast field of research. In supervised learning, uncertainty can already occur in the first stage of the training process, the annotation phase. This scenario is particularly evident when some instances cannot be definitively classified. In other words, there is inevitable ambiguity in the annotation step and hence, not necessarily a "ground truth" associated with each instance. The main idea of this work is to drop the assumption of a ground truth label and instead embed the annotations into a multidimensional space. This embedding is derived from the empirical distribution of annotations in a Bayesian setup, modeled via a Dirichlet-Multinomial framework. We estimate the model parameters and posteriors using a stochastic Expectation Maximization algorithm with Markov Chain Monte Carlo steps. The methods developed in this paper readily extend to various situations where multiple annotators independently label instances. To showcase the generality of the proposed approach, we apply our approach to three benchmark datasets for image classification and Natural Language Inference. Besides the embeddings, we can investigate the resulting correlation matrices, which reflect the semantic similarities of the original classes very well for all three exemplary datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2023.
Builds on
17 of 48 references.
References · 17
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2021Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotationscited by 306
- 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
- 2020What Can We Learn from Collective Human Opinions on Natural Language Inference Data?cited by 148
- 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
- 2022The 'Problem' of Human Label Variation: On Ground Truth in Data, Modeling and Evaluationcited by 133
- 2014Label Distribution Learningcited by 122
- 2016Deep Label Distribution Learning with Label Ambiguitycited by 104
- 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
5 more
- 2021Prior and Posterior Networks: A Survey on Evidential Deep Learning Methods For Uncertainty Estimationcited by 71
- 2023Uncertainty in Natural Language Generation: From Theory to Applicationscited by 61
- 2022The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 40
- 2023Sources of Uncertainty in Supervised Machine Learning -- A Statisticians' Viewcited by 27
- 2020Multi-level Feature Fusion-based CNN for Local Climate Zone Classification from Sentinel-2 Images: Benchmark Results on the So2Sat LCZ42 Datasetcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Revisiting Active Learning under (Human) Label Variationcited by 4
- 2025Revisiting Active Learning under (Human) Label Variation3 Jul 2025