mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How Well Do Text Embedding Models Understand Syntax?

arXiv 2311.07996 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2023cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text embedding models have significantly contributed to advancements in natural language processing by adeptly capturing semantic properties of textual data. However, the ability of these models to generalize across a wide range of syntactic contexts remains under-explored. In this paper, we first develop an evaluation set, named SR, to scrutinize the capability for syntax understanding of text embedding models from two crucial syntactic aspects: Structural heuristics, and Relational understanding among concepts, as revealed by the performance gaps in previous studies. Our findings reveal that existing text embedding models have not sufficiently addressed these syntactic understanding challenges, and such ineffectiveness becomes even more apparent when evaluated against existing benchmark datasets. Furthermore, we conduct rigorous analysis to unearth factors that lead to such limitations and examine why previous evaluations fail to detect such ineffectiveness. Lastly, we propose strategies to augment the generalization ability of text embedding models in diverse syntactic scenarios. This study serves to highlight the hurdles associated with syntactic generalization and provides pragmatic guidance for boosting model performance across varied syntactic contexts.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2023.

Builds on

25 of 39 references.

References · 25

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  4. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  5. 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,265
  6. 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
  7. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
  8. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  9. 2021Sentence-T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from Pre-trained Text-to-Text Modelscited by 462
  10. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
  11. 2022Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 358
  12. 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 350
13 more
  1. 2022One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddingscited by 329
  2. 2021ConSERT: A Contrastive Framework for Self-Supervised Sentence Representation Transfercited by 231
  3. 2022DiffCSE: Difference-based Contrastive Learning for Sentence Embeddingscited by 131
  4. 2019Open Sesame: Getting Inside BERT's Linguistic Knowledgecited by 119
  5. 2016Recurrent Neural Network Grammarscited by 109
  6. 2020Syntactic Structure from Deep Learningcited by 99
  7. 2020Self-training Improves Pre-training for Natural Language Understandingcited by 96
  8. 2020An Unsupervised Sentence Embedding Method by Mutual Information Maximizationcited by 91
  9. 2021Refining Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 41
  10. 2015Semi-supervised Question Retrieval with Gated Convolutionscited by 28
  11. 2022Generate, Discriminate and Contrast: A Semi-Supervised Sentence Representation Learning Frameworkcited by 18
  12. 2020Explicitly Modeling Syntax in Language Models with Incremental Parsing and a Dynamic Oraclecited by 5
  13. 2022Dataset vs Reality: Understanding Model Performance from the Perspective of Information Needcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

6 papers.