Grounding Neuroscience in Behavioral Changes using Artificial Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Connecting neural activity to function is a common aim in neuroscience. How to define and conceptualize function, however, can vary. Here I focus on grounding this goal in the specific question of how a given change in behavior is produced by a change in neural circuits or activity. Artificial neural network models offer a particularly fruitful format for tackling such questions because they use neural mechanisms to perform complex transformations and produce appropriate behavior. Therefore, they can be a means of causally testing the extent to which a neural change can be responsible for an experimentally observed behavioral change. Furthermore, because the field of interpretability in artificial intelligence has similar aims, neuroscientists can look to interpretability methods for new ways of identifying neural features that drive performance and behaviors.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023Exploring Causal Learning through Graph Neural Networks: An In-depth Reviewcited by 8
- 2025Large Language Models as Psychological Simulators: A Methodological Guidecited by 6
- 2024Philosophy of Cognitive Science in the Age of Deep Learningcited by 5
- 2025Active Electrosensing and Communication in MARL-trained Weakly Electric Fish Collectivescited by 0
- 2025Active Electrosensing and Communication in MARL-trained Weakly Electric Fish Collectives11 Nov 2025
- 2025Large Language Models as Psychological Simulators: A Methodological Guide20 Jun 2025
- 2024Philosophy of Cognitive Science in the Age of Deep Learning7 May 2024
- 2023Exploring Causal Learning through Graph Neural Networks: An In-depth Review25 Nov 2023