Gen-Z: Generative Zero-Shot Text Classification with Contextualized Label Descriptions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language model (LM) prompting--a popular paradigm for solving NLP tasks--has been shown to be susceptible to miscalibration and brittleness to slight prompt variations, caused by its discriminative prompting approach, i.e., predicting the label given the input. To address these issues, we propose Gen-Z--a generative prompting framework for zero-shot text classification. GEN-Z is generative, as it measures the LM likelihood of input text, conditioned on natural language descriptions of labels. The framework is multivariate, as label descriptions allow us to seamlessly integrate additional contextual information about the labels to improve task performance. On various standard classification benchmarks, with six open-source LM families, we show that zero-shot classification with simple contextualization of the data source of the evaluation set consistently outperforms both zero-shot and few-shot baselines while improving robustness to prompt variations. Further, our approach enables personalizing classification in a zero-shot manner by incorporating author, subject, or reader information in the label descriptions.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2023.
Builds on
38 of 56 references.
References · 38
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,122
26 more
- 2021An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inferencecited by 915
- 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 737
- 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 442
- 2013Good Debt or Bad Debt: Detecting Semantic Orientations in Economic Textscited by 310
- 2021Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detectioncited by 258
- 2021Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Rightcited by 256
- 2018Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systemscited by 234
- 2019SemEval-2017 Task 4: Sentiment Analysis in Twittercited by 209
- 2018Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forumcited by 196
- 2018Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Datacited by 166
- 2021Noisy Channel Language Model Prompting for Few-Shot Text Classificationcited by 163
- 2023What and How does In-Context Learning Learn? Bayesian Model Averaging, Parameterization, and Generalizationcited by 112
- 2023Mitigating Label Biases for In-context Learningcited by 88
- 2023A Theory of Emergent In-Context Learning as Implicit Structure Inductioncited by 86
- 2022Z-ICL: Zero-Shot In-Context Learning with Pseudo-Demonstrationscited by 70
- 2020ETHOS: an Online Hate Speech Detection Datasetcited by 66
- 2021Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution Shiftcited by 64
- 2023Evaluating the Zero-shot Robustness of Instruction-tuned Language Modelscited by 63
- 2022Prototypical Calibration for Few-shot Learning of Language Modelscited by 58
- 2023When Do Annotator Demographics Matter? Measuring the Influence of Annotator Demographics with the POPQUORN Datasetcited by 51
- 2021Diverse Adversaries for Mitigating Bias in Trainingcited by 48
- 2020Investigating Societal Biases in a Poetry Composition Systemcited by 47
- 2022Kernelized Concept Erasurecited by 47
- 2019Simple and Effective Noisy Channel Modeling for Neural Machine Translationcited by 37
- 2017Generative and Discriminative Text Classification with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 30
- 2015Overcoming Language Variation in Sentiment Analysis with Social Attentioncited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
7 papers.
- 2024ComPO: Community Preferences for Language Model Personalizationcited by 19
- 2026GLiGuard: Schema-Conditioned Classification for LLM Safeguardcited by 4
- 2025Do LLMs Adhere to Label Definitions? Examining Their Receptivity to External Label Definitionscited by 3
- 2026Small Reward Models via Backward Inferencecited by 2
- 2025Mapping the Course for Prompt-based Structured Predictioncited by 1
- 2026CALM: Class-Conditional Sparse Attention Vectors for Large Audio-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Beyond Surface Forms: A Comprehensive, Mechanism-Oriented Taxonomy of Indirect Linguistic Encoding for LLM-Based Coded Language Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Beyond Surface Forms: A Comprehensive, Mechanism-Oriented Taxonomy of Indirect Linguistic Encoding for LLM-Based Coded Language Detection25 Jun 2026
- 2026GLiGuard: Schema-Conditioned Classification for LLM Safeguard8 May 2026
- 2026Small Reward Models via Backward Inference14 Feb 2026
- 2026CALM: Class-Conditional Sparse Attention Vectors for Large Audio-Language Models6 Feb 2026
- 2025Do LLMs Adhere to Label Definitions? Examining Their Receptivity to External Label Definitions2 Sep 2025
- 2025Mapping the Course for Prompt-based Structured Prediction20 Aug 2025
- 2024ComPO: Community Preferences for Language Model Personalization21 Oct 2024