mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On non-approximability of zero loss global mathcal L2 minimizers by gradient descent in Deep Learning

arXiv 2311.07065 ↗First posted 13 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.AI math-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We analyze geometric aspects of the gradient descent algorithm in Deep Learning (DL), and give a detailed discussion of the circumstance that in underparametrized DL networks, zero loss minimization can generically not be attained. As a consequence, we conclude that the distribution of training inputs must necessarily be non-generic in order to produce zero loss minimizers, both for the method constructed in [Chen-Munoz Ewald 2023, 2024], or for gradient descent [Chen 2025] (which assume clustering of training data).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2023.

Builds on

7 of 11 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  2. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
  3. 2018How to Start Training: The Effect of Initialization and Architecturecited by 109
  4. 2020Optimization and Generalization of Shallow Neural Networks with Quadratic Activation Functionscited by 50
  5. 2023Mildly Overparameterized ReLU Networks Have a Favorable Loss Landscapecited by 17
  6. 2023Geometric structure of Deep Learning networks and construction of global mathcal L2 minimizerscited by 6
  7. 2023Geometric structure of shallow neural networks and constructive mathcal L2 cost minimizationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.