A PAC-Bayesian Perspective on the Interpolating Information Criterion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning is renowned for its theory-practice gap, whereby principled theory typically fails to provide much beneficial guidance for implementation in practice. This has been highlighted recently by the benign overfitting phenomenon: when neural networks become sufficiently large to interpolate the dataset perfectly, model performance appears to improve with increasing model size, in apparent contradiction with the well-known bias-variance tradeoff. While such phenomena have proven challenging to theoretically study for general models, the recently proposed Interpolating Information Criterion (IIC) provides a valuable theoretical framework to examine performance for overparameterized models. Using the IIC, a PAC-Bayes bound is obtained for a general class of models, characterizing factors which influence generalization performance in the interpolating regime. From the provided bound, we quantify how the test error for overparameterized models achieving effectively zero training error depends on the quality of the implicit regularization imposed by e.g. the combination of model, optimizer, and parameter-initialization scheme; the spectrum of the empirical neural tangent kernel; curvature of the loss landscape; and noise present in the data.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2023.
Builds on
37 of 51 references.
References · 37
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 595
- 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
- 2017A PAC-Bayesian Approach to Spectrally-Normalized Margin Bounds for Neural Networkscited by 309
- 2019PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessiancited by 291
- 2021User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes boundscited by 234
- 2018Just Interpolate: Kernel "Ridgeless" Regression Can Generalizecited by 190
- 2021On the Origin of Implicit Regularization in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 183
- 2021Fit without fear: remarkable mathematical phenomena of deep learning through the prism of interpolationcited by 130
25 more
- 2020Predicting trends in the quality of state-of-the-art neural networks without access to training or testing datacited by 113
- 2019Traditional and Heavy-Tailed Self Regularization in Neural Network Modelscited by 104
- 2023A Modern Look at the Relationship between Sharpness and Generalizationcited by 91
- 2017Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 90
- 2016PAC-Bayesian Theory Meets Bayesian Inferencecited by 87
- 2018Hessian-based Analysis of Large Batch Training and Robustness to Adversariescited by 87
- 2022PAC-Bayes Compression Bounds So Tight That They Can Explain Generalizationcited by 75
- 2020A Random Matrix Analysis of Random Fourier Features: Beyond the Gaussian Kernel, a Precise Phase Transition, and the Corresponding Double Descentcited by 69
- 2022Fast Finite Width Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 62
- 2022Bayesian Model Selection, the Marginal Likelihood, and Generalizationcited by 56
- 2021Analytic Insights into Structure and Rank of Neural Network Hessian Mapscited by 52
- 2020Deep Learning is Singular, and That's Goodcited by 49
- 2020Multiple Descent: Design Your Own Generalization Curvecited by 44
- 2019Heavy-Tailed Universality Predicts Trends in Test Accuracies for Very Large Pre-Trained Deep Neural Networkscited by 43
- 2020Kernel regression in high dimensions: Refined analysis beyond double descentcited by 39
- 2019Exact expressions for double descent and implicit regularization via surrogate random designcited by 35
- 2021Hessian Eigenspectra of More Realistic Nonlinear Modelscited by 33
- 2023Benign Overfitting in Linear Classifiers and Leaky ReLU Networks from KKT Conditions for Margin Maximizationcited by 29
- 2020Modern Monte Carlo Methods for Efficient Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation: A Surveycited by 21
- 2022Bayesian Interpolation with Deep Linear Networkscited by 21
- 2023The Interpolating Information Criterion for Overparameterized Modelscited by 11
- 2022Monotonicity and Double Descent in Uncertainty Estimation with Gaussian Processescited by 10
- 2023The Hessian perspective into the Nature of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2021On quantitative Laplace-type convergence results for some exponential probability measures, with two applicationscited by 5
- 2022Cold Posteriors through PAC-Bayescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2026Is the Last Layer Sufficient for Uncertainty Quantification?29 May 2026
- 2026A Regularization-Sharpness Tradeoff for Linear Interpolators13 Feb 2026
- 2025Spectral Estimation with Free Decompression13 Jun 2025
- 2025Determinant Estimation under Memory Constraints and Neural Scaling Laws6 Mar 2025