Are LLMs Rigorous Logical Reasoners? Empowering Natural Language Proof Generation by Stepwise Decoding with Contrastive Learning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Logical reasoning is a pivotal component in the field of artificial intelligence. Proof planning, particularly in contexts requiring the validation of explanation accuracy, continues to present challenges. The recent advancement of large language models (LLMs) has led to significant progress in natural language proof planning, evolving from one-stage generators to more complex three-stage systems that include additional searchers or verifiers. While these assisted methods improve the quality of generated results, they also introduce increased search efforts and computational costs. Furthermore, the generative process itself remains underexplored. In this study, we propose a stepwise decoding approach augmented by contrastive learning to address two common errors encountered during the LLM generator's decoding process. We fine-tune the language model using both vanilla and enhanced hard negatives to mitigate these decoding errors. Empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of our strategy. Additionally, our further analysis reveals that even larger LLMs still struggle to generate rigorous logical chains.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2023.
Builds on
16 of 42 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Are Large Language Models Really Good Logical Reasoners? A Comprehensive Evaluation and Beyond16 Jun
- 2023PaLM 2 Technical Report17 May
- 2023Logical Reasoning over Natural Language as Knowledge Representation: A Survey21 Mar
- 2022LAMBADA: Backward Chaining for Automated Reasoning in Natural Language20 Dec
- 2022Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-Thought3 Oct
- 2022FOLIO: Natural Language Reasoning with First-Order Logic2 Sep
- 2022Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical Reasoning19 May
Other references · 9
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
- 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 878
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
- 2022Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 388
- 2015Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Taskscited by 314
- 2023Vera: A General-Purpose Plausibility Estimation Model for Commonsense Statementscited by 44
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Enhancing Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs via Principled Synthetic Logic Corpus
- 2025Can Large Language Models Learn Formal Logic? A Data-Driven Training and Evaluation Framework
- 2024Proof of Thought : Neurosymbolic Program Synthesis allows Robust and Interpretable Reasoning
- 2025Beyond Correctness: Exposing LLM-generated Logical Flaws in Reasoning via Multi-step Automated Theorem Proving
- 2023Contrastive Decoding Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025LogicReward: Incentivizing LLM Reasoning via Step-Wise Logical Supervision
- 2026Pushing the Boundaries of Natural Reasoning: Interleaved Bonus from Formal-Logic Verification
- 2025Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey